-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Rename AdaptorConfig to TFileAdaptor #49654
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
No code in CMSSW can now read these configurations.
The framework already adds AdaptorConfig to all configurations.
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
please test |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49654/47198
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones for master. It involves the following packages:
@Dr15Jones, @civanch, @ctarricone, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @gabrielmscampos, @kpedro88, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @nothingface0, @rseidita, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 220KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 |
makortel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. I think this PR is for 16_1_X (given the closeness of the build of 16_0_0_pre4).
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 164KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
| #-------------------------- | ||
|
|
||
| process.ModuleWebRegistry = cms.Service("ModuleWebRegistry") | ||
| process.AdaptorConfig = cms.Service("AdaptorConfig") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excuse the ignorance, but why are all those lines removed?
process.AdaptorConfig = cms.Service("AdaptorConfig
Are they not needed, in the sense that the service is added/instantiated by default somewhere else?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, since the very beginning of CMSSW, that service has been automatically added to the system.
|
Milestone for this pull request has been moved to CMSSW_16_1_X. Please open a backport if it should also go in to CMSSW_16_0_X. |
|
Comparison differences are related to #47071 |
|
+core Now that master branch moved to 16_1_X |
|
+dqm |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
PR validation:
Code compiles. Framework unit tests pass.
resolves cms-sw/framework-team#1717