[15_1_X] Enabling SiPixel digi morphing from 2025 onward

[ferencek]

PR description:

Backport of #49065 to CMSSW_15_1_X

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ferencek for CMSSW_15_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/Eras (operations)

@cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Enabling SiPixel digi morphing from 2025 onward #49065

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[mmusich]

backport of #49065

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[mandrenguyen]

backport of #49065

[nothingface0]

Question: why isn't this modifying the DQM modules like the PR to master is? Is it not meant to go into production until next year?

[mmusich]

Question: why isn't this modifying the DQM modules like the PR to master is? Is it not meant to go into production until next year?

I guess the commit was just not yet backported :D

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-92e553/48482/summary.html
COMMIT: 25c2297
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_1_X_2025-10-05-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/49066/48482/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found 2 errors in the following unit tests:

---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-beampixel_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS
---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-beam_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2549 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4124047
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 978
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4123049
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 215 log files, 184 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[ferencek]

Question: why isn't this modifying the DQM modules like the PR to master is? Is it not meant to go into production until next year?

I guess the commit was just not yet backported :D

Indeed. The fix was just made and I first want to be sure that it works. If it does, it will be backported.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #49066 was updated. @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @gabrielmscampos, @mandrenguyen, @nothingface0, @rseidita can you please check and sign again.

[mmusich]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-92e553/48492/summary.html
COMMIT: 1718761
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_1_X_2025-10-06-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/49066/48492/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2560 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4124047
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 982
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4123045
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 215 log files, 184 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[nothingface0]

+dqm

• Rushed checks of histo comparison probably OK
• P5 tests ok (see Enabling SiPixel digi morphing from 2025 onward #49065)

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_15_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_16_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[mmusich]

Rushed checks of histo comparison probably OK

see #49065 (comment)

[mandrenguyen]

+1