-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Add fill description for PFCandidateFwdPtrProducer #48884
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48884/46041 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @stahlleiton for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
| if (std::is_same<reco::PFCandidate, T>::value) | ||
| ps.add<edm::InputTag>("src", {"particleFlowTmp"}); | ||
| else | ||
| ps.add<edm::InputTag>("src"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please put a default also here, even if empty (ie, "").
ConfDB parsing requires a value, otherwise the parameter will not exist in ConfDb where we keep the HLT menus!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't quite understand why we need to make reco::PFCandidate a special case. I would just supply a generic empty string in all cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I can do it for all cases. Thought we wanted to have one fill description specifically for the PF case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thought we wanted to have one fill description specifically for the PF case
This came into the context of a specific template specification involving PF because it's the only module of this type used in the HLT (which cares the most about this feature), but I really don't see the point of not making it general as you are touching the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done, I updated the PR as suggested
|
Milestone for this pull request has been moved to CMSSW_16_0_X. Please open a backport if it should also go in to CMSSW_15_1_X. |
|
please test |
4482228 to
f76206f
Compare
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48884/46054 |
f76206f to
6a768a9
Compare
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48884/46056 |
|
Pull request #48884 was updated. @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please check and sign again. |
|
please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals |
|
ignore tests-rejected with ib-failure |
|
+1 |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (test failures were overridden). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR adds a fill description for PFCandidateFwdPtrProducer
@Moanwar @yongbinfeng
PR validation:
Checked locally that the configuration is created
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for: