Skip to content

Conversation

@gsokmen
Copy link
Contributor

@gsokmen gsokmen commented Aug 27, 2025

This PR introduces a new version (v3) of the SuperclusterDNN to be used for superclustering in TICLv5. This PR includes updates to the previous DNN model as well as the superclustering algorithm. The model and algorithm are used for reconstructing electromagnetic objects within TICL.

-This PR needs to be tested with the following cms-data PR: cms-data/RecoHGCal-TICL#9

-It needs to be tested with the following workflows
. 29646.203
. 29846.203

-Validation plots are attached.
Validation_SuperclusterDNN_v3_4Sept_GSokmen.pdf

@waredjeb @felicepantaleo @sameasy

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 27, 2025

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48811/45919

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor

allow @waredjeb test rights

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor

allow @sameasy test rights

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor

type hgcal

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:
pull_request = cms-data/RecoHGCal-TICL#9
workflow_opts = -w upgrade
workflows = 29646.203,29846.203

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48811/45921

@waredjeb
Copy link
Contributor

waredjeb commented Oct 8, 2025

@mmusich looks like we don't have the reproducibility problem anymore after the merging of #49023
what do you think?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 8, 2025

what do you think?

there is too much churn going on in tests (due also to #49073). Let's wait to have the solution to that merged and run a final round of tests.

@waredjeb
Copy link
Contributor

waredjeb commented Oct 8, 2025

what do you think?

there is too much churn going on in tests (due also to #49073). Let's wait to have the solution to that merged and run a final round of tests.

ok perfect, thanks!

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 12, 2025

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5bb023/48618/summary.html
COMMIT: f70dfb5
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_0_X_2025-10-12-0000/el8_amd64_gcc13
Additional Tests: HLT_P2_INTEGRATION,HLT_P2_TIMING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/48811/48618/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 18 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 64
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4293829
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 59
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4293750
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 63 files compared)
  • Checked 263 log files, 223 edm output root files, 64 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 62 workflows

@waredjeb
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mmusich , looks like we don't have the differences anymore, what do you think?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 13, 2025

TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 62 workflows

there are changes in the trigger results (in L1 algos?). Probably not related though.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 13, 2025

+hlt

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)
Notice This PR was tested with additional Pull Request(s), please also merge them if necessary: cms-data/RecoHGCal-TICL#9

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 14, 2025

there are changes in the trigger results (in L1 algos?). Probably not related though.

for completeness I re-run the tests in a vacuum at #49063 (comment) and I don't see the same. I wonder if it reproduces here.

@waredjeb
Copy link
Contributor

there are changes in the trigger results (in L1 algos?). Probably not related though.

for completeness I re-run the tests in a vacuum at #49063 (comment) and I don't see the same. I wonder if it reproduces here.

If I understood correctly the differences, they are shown in workflow 29634.0 which is the default (no procModifiers) with TICLv4. This PR does not touch anything in TICLv4 so I would guess it should not be related to this PR. But if you have doubts I can try to run additional tests

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 14, 2025

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5bb023/48680/summary.html
COMMIT: f70dfb5
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_0_X_2025-10-14-1100/el8_amd64_gcc13
Additional Tests: HLT_P2_INTEGRATION,HLT_P2_TIMING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/48811/48680/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 12 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 64
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4293829
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4293795
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 63 files compared)
  • Checked 263 log files, 223 edm output root files, 64 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 859386e into cms-sw:master Oct 15, 2025
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants