-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Silence Wdangling-reference in RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers alpaka plugin #48041
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
please test for el8_amd64_gcc14 |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48041/44758 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @iarspider for master. It involves the following packages:
@jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test for el8_amd64_gcc14 |
|
should we apply this flag only for RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers/plugins/alpaka/EcalUncalibRecHitPhase2WeightsAlgoPortable.dev.cc file? and may be only when compiler if gcc version 14? |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48041/44759 |
|
Pull request #48041 was updated. @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please check and sign again. |
I couldn't find any example of doing it. As far as I understand |
@iarspider , try something like the following |
|
@smuzaffar thanks! |
|
please test for el8_amd64_gcc14 |
6b420be to
75e6a3d
Compare
done |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48041/44793
|
|
please test |
|
please test for el8_amd64_gcc14 |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-497a37/46092/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@iarspider , if this is ready then please unhold it |
|
unhold |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
As suggested by @fwyzard in #47945 (comment)
PR validation:
Bot tests