-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
TestDQMOfflineConfigurationGotAll: increase the number of considered DQM sequences
#45287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TestDQMOfflineConfigurationGotAll: increase the number of considered DQM sequences
#45287
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45287/40684
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master. It involves the following packages:
@syuvivida, @rvenditti, @tjavaid, @antoniovagnerini, @nothingface0, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3fb73a/40029/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
ecbef3c to
bf7246c
Compare
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45287/40689
|
|
Pull request #45287 was updated. @cmsbuild, @antoniovagnerini, @tjavaid, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida can you please check and sign again. |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTComparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@cmsbuild, please test
|
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3fb73a/40046/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
urgent
|
|
+1
|
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR offers a fix for the issue that developed in IBs in the
DQMOffline/Configurationpackage (see e.g. log) presumably due to increase of distinct DQM sequences in release.PR validation:
scram b runtests_TestDQMOfflineConfigurationGotAllruns fine with this PR.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, not to be backported