-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Refactor scatterer addition in aGblPoint to explicitly specify type for scatPrecision.inverse() #44340
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor scatterer addition in aGblPoint to explicitly specify type for scatPrecision.inverse() #44340
Conversation
…or scatPrecision.inverse()
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
test parameters:
|
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44340/39376
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master. It involves the following packages:
@saumyaphor4252, @consuegs, @perrotta, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9986c2/37991/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@cms-sw/externals-l2 @cms-sw/orp-l2 @cms-sw/alca-l2 following the discussion in comment, can this be reviewed and merged for the next IB? |
|
urgent |
|
+alca
|
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
To test with cms-sw/cmsdist#9053
PR validation:
cmsswcompilesIf this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A