extend PU Flat55To75 to 2024 workflows

[slava77]

extend PU Flat55To75 to 2024 workflows

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42653/36713

• This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Custom_Muon_POG_NanoAOD #42039

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@bbilin, @srimanob, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @miquork, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @missirol, @slomeo, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[slava77]

test parameters:

• workflow = 13034.0

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please abort test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42653/36714

• This PR adds an extra 56KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Custom_Muon_POG_NanoAOD #42039

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #42653 was updated. @bbilin, @srimanob, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @miquork, @sunilUIET can you please check and sign again.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-221eea/34464/summary.html
COMMIT: 68ef15d
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-08-23-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/42653/34464/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

• @missirol simplify implementation of SiPixelQualityESProducer and use multiple instances of it #42497

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-221eea/34464/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-221eea/34464/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 251 lines to the logs
• ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
• Reco comparison results: 3233 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3312525
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9513
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 13
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3302977
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 7.441 KiB( 48 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 13034.0 ): 7.441 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
• Checked 211 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 47 workflows

[slava77]

Reco comparison results: 3233 differences found in the comparisons

as expected, changes are only in 13034.0 workflows, consistent with increased pileup.

[sunilUIET]

+pdmv

[mmusich]

@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 please have a look

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1