Skip to content

[L1T] bug-fix: rename l1ctLayer1 objects#39704

Merged
cmsbuild merged 1 commit intocms-sw:masterfrom
cecilecaillol:l1t-l1ct
Oct 12, 2022
Merged

[L1T] bug-fix: rename l1ctLayer1 objects#39704
cmsbuild merged 1 commit intocms-sw:masterfrom
cecilecaillol:l1t-l1ct

Conversation

@cecilecaillol
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR renames the l1ctLayer1 objects to l1tLayer1 objects. These occurrences were forgotten in the wide renaming of L1 modules.
It was spotted in this PR #39451 to 12_5

@cecilecaillol
Copy link
Contributor Author

type bug-fix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39704/32535

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @cecilecaillol for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • L1Trigger/Phase2L1ParticleFlow (upgrade, l1)
  • L1Trigger/Phase2L1Taus (l1)

@rekovic, @epalencia, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @cecilecaillol can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @beaucero, @trtomei this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-907478/28189/summary.html
COMMIT: af6bf9f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-11-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39704/28189/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-907478/20834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-907478/20834.75_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88_HLT75e33+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HLT75e33+HARVESTGlobal
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-907478/20896.0_CloseByPGun_CE_E_Front_120um+2026D88+CE_E_Front_120um_GenSimHLBeamSpotHGCALCloseBy+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-907478/20900.0_CloseByPGun_CE_H_Coarse_Scint+2026D88+CE_H_Coarse_Scint_GenSimHLBeamSpotHGCALCloseBy+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-907478/21034.999_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88PU_PMXS1S2PR+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+PREMIX_PremixHLBeamSpot14PU+DigiTriggerPU+RecoGlobalPU+HARVESTGlobalPU
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-907478/23234.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D94+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 11 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3392309
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3392278
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 49 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

Obvious fix, as mentioned in #39451 (comment)

@cecilecaillol
Copy link
Contributor Author

+l1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants