Skip to content

Conversation

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR offers a fix to PR #38437, that disables mkFit for pixelLessStep, so that the new era is fully recognized.

PR validation:

Standard MTV for SoftQCD (PU=0) sample:
http://uaf-10.t2.ucsd.edu/~mmasciov/MIC/SoftQCD/MTV_SoftQCD_PRFix/

Denominator (blue): default Run3 era
cmsDriver.py step3 --conditions auto:phase1_2022_realistic -s RAW2DIGI,RECO:reconstruction_trackingOnly,VALIDATION:@trackingOnlyValidation,DQM:@trackingOnlyDQM --datatier DQMIO -n 5000 --geometry DB:Extended --era Run3 --eventcontent DQM --no_exec --filein file:/data2/mmasciov/SoftQCD/CMSSW_12_4_0_pre4/src/step2.root --fileout step3_SoftQCD_default.root --python_filename step3_SoftQCD_default.py --nThreads 8

Numerator (red): Run3_ckfPixelLessSttep era
cmsDrivery.py step3 --conditions auto:phase1_2022_realistic -s RAW2DIGI,RECO:reconstruction_trackingOnly,VALIDATION:@trackingOnlyValidation,DQM:@trackingOnlyDQM --datatier DQMIO -n 5000 --geometry DB:Extended --era Run3_ckfPixelLessStep --eventcontent DQM --no_exec --filein file:/data2/mmasciov/SoftQCD/CMSSW_12_4_0_pre4/src/step2.root --fileout step3_SoftQCD_ckfPixelLess.root --python_filename step3_SoftQCD_ckfPixelLess.py --nThreads 8

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38565/30814

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmasciov (Mario Masciovecchio) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/Eras (operations)
  • Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)

@cmsbuild, @perrotta, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @lecriste, @mtosi, @ebrondol, @mmusich, @dgulhan, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 30, 2022

duplicate of #38563

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 30, 2022

@mmasciov please add a wf to runTheMatrix so that it can tested.
Thanks.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 30, 2022

urgent

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 30, 2022

type bugfix

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 30, 2022

please add a wf to runTheMatrix so that it can tested.

In case it helps:

diff --git a/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py b/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py
index 9ab9381e003..9bf5859d218 100644
--- a/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py
+++ b/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py
@@ -379,6 +379,27 @@ upgradeWFs['trackingMkFit'].step3 = {
     '--procModifiers': 'trackingMkFit'
 }
 
+# NoMkFitPixelLess workflows
+class UpgradeWorkflow_NoMkFitPixelLess(UpgradeWorkflow):
+    def setup_(self, step, stepName, stepDict, k, properties):
+        stepDict[stepName][k] = merge([{'--era': 'Run3_ckfPixelLessStep'}, stepDict[step][k]])
+    def condition(self, fragment, stepList, key, hasHarvest):
+        return fragment=="TTbar_14TeV" and '2021' in key
+upgradeWFs['NoMkFitPixelLess'] = UpgradeWorkflow_NoMkFitPixelLess(
+    steps = [
+        'Reco',
+        'RecoNano',
+        'RecoGlobal',
+    ],
+    PU = [
+        'Reco',
+        'RecoNano',
+        'RecoGlobal',
+    ],
+    suffix = '_NoMkFitPixelLess',
+    offset = 0.71,
+)
+
 #DeepCore seeding for JetCore iteration workflow
 class UpgradeWorkflow_seedingDeepCore(UpgradeWorkflow):
     def setup_(self, step, stepName, stepDict, k, properties):

this seems to work..

@mmasciov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmusich, just added a commit with this. Sorry for the delay.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 30, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflows = 11634.71, 11634.72

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 30, 2022

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38565/30817

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #38565 was updated. @perrotta, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@jordan-martins
Copy link
Contributor

jordan-martins commented Jun 30, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-aecc63/25916/summary.html
COMMIT: e6ea952
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-29-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38565/25916/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-aecc63/11634.71_TTbar_14TeV+2021_trackingRun3CkfPixelLessStep+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+RecoNano+HARVESTNano
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-aecc63/11634.72_TTbar_14TeV+2021_trackingOnlyRun3CkfPixelLessStep+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+RecoNano+HARVESTNano

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3654586
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3654562
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 30, 2022

Can we bypass upgrade here? It has nothing to do with it.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

Can we bypass upgrade here? It has nothing to do with it.

That was indeed my intention. But I wanted to look at the logs of the newly defined wfs first, at least. No specific issues reported, let merge this in master then

By the way @mmusich : while looking at the logs I noticed the following warning (unrelated to this fix) that you may be interested in:

%MSG
%MSG-e TkDetLayers:   TrackerRecoGeometryESProducer:TrackerRecoGeometryESProducer@callESModule  30-Jun-2022 16:12:20 CEST Run: 1 Stream: 0
 ForwardDiskSectorBuilderFromDet: Trying to build Petal Wedge from Dets at different z positions !! Delta_z = -0.951241
%MSG

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

merge
(this fix is not related to upgrade)

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2f4273a into cms-sw:master Jun 30, 2022
cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2022
[124X (backport)] Fix PR #38450 (backport of #38437) to disable mkFit in pixelLessStep: backport of PR #38565
@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

+1
(Just to remove the label, this actually has nothing to do with upgrade)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 30, 2022

@perrotta

while looking at the logs I noticed the following warning (unrelated to this fix) that you may be interested in

See #34476. In short, wontfix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants