-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Phase2-hgx315Y Try to fix the error reported in #38276 #38281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38281/30431
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38281/30432
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b7d9b0/25349/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
Pull request #38281 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b7d9b0/25458/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test workflow 36234.0 for CMSSW_12_5_UBSAN_X |
|
+1 |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b7d9b0/25493/summary.html |
|
Hi @bsunanda @Pruthvi-ch |
|
@srimanob When there is a bug, one does not knw what it could cause. As it was taking values outside bound in the buggy version, we were expecting changes in the workflows |
|
@srimanob Please approve this |
|
+Upgrade |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
Try to fix the error reported in #38276
PR validation:
Tested by scenario 2026D92
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special - it is a Bug Fix