-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Fixing FastTimerClient Hist Remaking Issue : 12_4_X #37402
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
cmsbuild
merged 2 commits into
cms-sw:master
from
Sam-Harper:FastTimerClientHistResetFixes_1230pre6
Mar 31, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't the default be "false", according to what you write in the comments?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's just that the description does not take into account the latest changes applied to the PR.
In the description, replacing this sentence
with this sentence
would better reflect the content of the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@missirol in #37402 (comment) you were also suggesting to keep "disable per-LS updates" as the default, which is the same as written in the PR description.
@Sam-Harper , @missirol could you please agree on what's your actual intent here, and either fix the PR or its description? It can be merged right after.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@perrotta , I wrote that, but later comments clarified that it was safer to keep the default unchanged (per-LS update enabled by default), see #37402 (comment).
In summary, the PR description needs to be updated (it is already correct in the backport PR). @Sam-Harper could you please edit ? (I don't think I can)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry the intent changed. So 99% of people will want it to default to false. However changing the default behaviour will mess up online DQM and for the quiet life, I decided it was better to just keep the old behaviour (which is fine just inefficient) and have users update. Regardless the majority of users will actually be running a config we control not them so we can just disable it there.
So just to sumarise: Andrea raised the point that turning this off will effect online DQM. Therefore we have kept the old behaviour as default otherwise we would need to adapt DQM workflows and this is a late fix.