-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Create new ECAL DQM GpuTask to monitor and compare CPU and GPU generated ECAL Rec Hits #35947
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @alejands (Alejandro Sanchez) for CMSSW_12_1_X. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMServicesDemo had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
backport |
|
backport of #35946 |
|
We believe that the tests failed due to the GPU ecalRecHits not being enabled in CMSSW at the moment. The |
|
Pull request #35947 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
ecbe217 to
a47505d
Compare
|
@jfernan2 I have removed the modification commit from the commit history |
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-788a01/20200/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
-1 |
|
enable gpu |
|
Pull request #35947 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-788a01/20232/summary.html GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test |
|
@qliphy I have significant updates to this code that I'm about to submit as a new PR very soon. Perhaps it's best to close this PR and submit it all together |
|
please abort |
PR description:
PPD has requested DQM subsystems to monitor several GPU-enabled collections being introduced in CMSSW_12_1_X. We have introduced a new EcalMonitorTask called GpuTask designed to take in CPU and GPU generated rec hits and produce plots comparing several rec hit quantities for each run. We don't explicitly plot the GPU rec hit values for the sake of memory efficiency. Additional plots may be added in the future.
This task will not run by default on the regular Online DQM workflow.
PR validation:
One caveat to this version of the code is that we have not been able to test it on actual GPU rec hits. There appears to be no workflow currently that produces both types of rec hit collections. We have been informed by Thomas Reis that CPU and GPU ECAL rec hits are the same data type, so our testing is done by changing the input tags so that both collections are the CPU rec hits.
This code was run with the runTheMatrix workflow 10842.512 and the new plots look as expected.
Backport
This is a backport of #35946 to include this code in the 12_1_X release.