-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
CT-PPS: Association cut update #35248
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @sgrzegorz for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @andrius-k, @yuanchao, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @rvenditti, @cmsbuild, @jpata, @jfernan2, @slava77, @ggovi, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@sgrzegorz can you please add subsystem name to PR title (CT-PPS)? |
|
@sgrzegorz and please also clean up the commit history with a git squash, thanks! |
|
@cmsbuild please test |
e7b67fc to
8a136c9
Compare
@tvami @jan-kaspar I squashed the commits. Here is what I did: pick aa646ef Added PPSAssociationCutsESSource Class |
|
Pull request #35248 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @rvenditti, @cmsbuild, @jpata, @jfernan2, @slava77, @ggovi, @francescobrivio, @pbo0, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
|
Pull request #35248 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @rvenditti, @cmsbuild, @jpata, @jfernan2, @slava77, @ggovi, @francescobrivio, @pbo0, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5d6f42/18759/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+alca |
|
+db
|
|
+1 |
|
+reconstruction
|
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
The idea behind this pull request is to improve the association cuts mechanism by providing better and more flexible
way of handling association cuts - the rules to match the local tracks from the near RP to those from the far RP.
Code changes for association cuts include
The update is fully backward compatible - we expect no changes for Run2 workflows. The new flexibility is only exploited in Run3 configurations.
Once this PR is merged, we plan to upload the cuts into the DB. Eventually, we plan to issue a small follow PR where the cuts are consumed from the DB in the standard reco workflows.
PR documentation includes:
1_sroka_pps_association_cuts.pdf
2_kaspar_pps_association_cuts.pdf
PR validation:
The plots below compare results before (blue solid) and after this PR (red dashed):