-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Move FWCore and Configuration python scripts to python3 #34352
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34352/23730
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Applications @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @wajidalikhan, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @makortel, @srimanob, @silviodonato, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@davidlange6 did you try running the |
|
I ran at least mkesprod and mkedprod. any of the others follow a different pattern that I should test out? |
|
please test |
|
@davidlange6 mkskel is the only outlier I can think of. |
|
that runs ok as well |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b5303/16501/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 Reco comparison differences look like the order Paths has changed between the baseline and py3 version of these files, presumably order of dictionary keys in ConfigBuilder or something similar. Py3 build has anyway been validated by PdmV. |
FWCore/Skeletons/python/utils.py
Outdated
| print("\n### generated code\n") | ||
| print(func) | ||
| # compile python code as exec statement | ||
| print(func) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need this line also outside debug? If need, should we move it out from debug (line 102, above)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good question. I'm not sure how I added that, but it was not intended. Fixing that.
|
Please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestConfigDP had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
this failed test hit a timeout |
|
+1 |
|
+Upgrade |
|
+1 |
|
+operations |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
|
merge |
No description provided.