-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
MTD reconstruction: code cleaning for old comments (issue #24452) #33680
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33680/22581
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/StandardSequences @perrotta, @silviodonato, @franzoni, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @slava77, @jpata, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-239dc0/14970/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33680/22598
|
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33680/22675
|
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-239dc0/15098/summary.html CMS Clang-Tidy warnings: There are Clang-Tidy warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-239dc0/15098/llvm-analysis/cmsclangtidy.txt for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1
|
|
+Upgrade Code cleaning with no changes expected. |
|
+1 |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
At the time of MTD TDR the reconstruction code was quickly integrated, due to the time constraints, leaving a number of minor comments pending for future cleaning. They were summarised in issue #24452 . Part of them was already addressed, this PR is meant to solve
most ofthe items in the list #24452 (comment) (mostly code aesthetics, by @kpedro88 @Dr15Jones @slava77 ).Those not yet solved here will be separately addressed with the original reviewers in parallel to this PR review.PR validation:
Code compiles and run, test wf 34634.0 provides the same DQM output.