-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Cleaning of ElectroWeakAnalysis in CMSSWReleaseDependency.rules #33113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleaning of ElectroWeakAnalysis in CMSSWReleaseDependency.rules #33113
Conversation
|
please test |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33113/21455
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @silviodonato (Silvio Donato) for master. It involves the following packages: Utilities/ReleaseScripts @makortel, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6e565f/13375/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
kind reminder @cms-sw/core-l2 |
|
+1 |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
Cleaning of ElectroWeakAnalysis in CMSSWReleaseDependency.rules
Follow-up of #32917 (comment) by @smuzaffar :
cc @cms-sw/core-l2
PR validation:
scram b runtestsif this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No backport expected