-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Move CaloL1 online DQM to Global #32004
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ca6de1d
Move CaloL1 online DQM to Global
84fb423
Add DQMGlobalRunSummaryEDAnalyzer to support use of edm::RunSummaryCache
makortel 744c631
Change CaloL1 Online DQM to make use of stream modules
ff763f7
Clarify CaloL1 Online DQM function names
6db14ec
Update CaloL1 Online DQM function parameter names, and some commenting
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is
unique_ptrbetter here thanstd::map<std::string, int> maxEvtLinkErrorsMapECAL;?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the reasoning behind this was, as you were noting above, my way to dodge the compiler errors for a
constfunction modifying class elements by making the class element an unedited pointer to some mutable object that I was working with (which, I grant you, seems like a textbook way to write terminally buggy code).I think continuing from the above, what is necessary for this module to maintain it's previous functionality and also is a thread safe dynamically sized vector/map type of object whose contents are mutable in the analysis functions for storing luminosity block information at the run cached level. Will
tbb::concurrent_vector<>'s provide this? I assume that there's also probably a considerable speed cost associated with an object like this?Thanks,
Andrew Loeliger