-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Tools for CUDA modules (11_0_X) #28538
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for CMSSW_11_0_X. It involves the following packages: CUDADataFormats/Common The following packages do not have a category, yet: CUDADataFormats/Common @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
6fb1aff to
e38e34f
Compare
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
2 similar comments
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
|
backport #28537 |
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @fwyzard can you please check and sign again. |
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @fwyzard can you please check and sign again. |
02ef90c to
1e5a2e2
Compare
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @fwyzard can you please check and sign again. |
1 similar comment
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @fwyzard can you please check and sign again. |
b5a884a to
f250584
Compare
|
Pull request #28538 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @fwyzard can you please check and sign again. |
|
@makortel could you clarify why you need this backport in 11_0_X? |
|
@silviodonato that is something I asked before 11.0.0, in order to simplify the maintenance of the Patatrack branch. Since it didn't make it for 11.0.0 and we have to move the development to 11.1.x anyway, I think we can actually close this. |
PR description:
Backporting #28537:
PR validation:
Unit tests run on both GPU and non-GPU machines.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:
Backport of #28537 (by using exactly the same branch).