fastjet 3.4.1 and fastjet-contrib 1.051#8485
fastjet 3.4.1 and fastjet-contrib 1.051#8485smuzaffar merged 1 commit intoIB/CMSSW_13_1_X/masterfrom
Conversation
|
please test |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_13_1_X/master. @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1a7434/32304/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1a7434/32325/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@perrotta @rappoccio is it too late to get this in for 13.1.X ? |
|
@smuzaffar I intended to build pre4 ~now |
|
+externals |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_13_1_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
Thanks @perrotta , I have merged it now. If it helps then I can start an IB too |
Do you think it is needed? |
|
11h00 IB does not contain this change, so you have to wait for 23h00 IB results. If this is fine then no need to build an extra IB |
Good question. I don't recall seeing fastjet-specific thread safety problems in a long time, but I don't expect our testing to be able catch all possible problems :) Since the comparisons were clean, I'd be tempted to backport these fixes to 13_0_X (but maybe after 13_1_0_pre4 has been validated? |
Update fastjet 3.4.1 with bug fixes