-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 265
Nano Comparison: Keep WF full name and forward it to .json files #2487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ftorrresd for branch master. @cmsbuild, @iarspider, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
enable nano (do I have rights in this repo?) |
|
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#47934 |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7a0733/45691/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
|
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#47943 |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7a0733/45706/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
|
REMINDER @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen: This PR was tested with cms-sw/cmssw#47943, please check if they should be merged together |
|
+1 |
|
+externals |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
Its is ready. Should also work without cms-sw/cmssw#47943 . Thanks! |
Currently the nano comparison report will shows only the WF number. The goal is to have the the full WF name available.
The table:
Will become:
Since I don´t know how to test this proposal in this repo, I'm placing this PR and hoping to test during review.