Skip to content

Conversation

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 slava77 commented Oct 13, 2022

this should clear the warnings in the comparisons summaries

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for branch master.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Oct 13, 2022

@cmsbuild please test

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Oct 13, 2022

@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 @cms-sw/reconstruction-l2

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d38911/28238/summary.html
COMMIT: 839ca33
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-13-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cms-bot/1860/28238/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3392309
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3392287
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 49 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Oct 13, 2022

Comparison Summary

it looks like all 6 workflows for phase2 were recognized and comparisons directories with logs show up as expected.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+externals

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants