Skip to content

Conversation

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 slava77 commented Nov 19, 2020

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for branch master.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Nov 19, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 19, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 4028428
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e4e103/10870/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-11-19-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e4e103/10870/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2962300
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2962265
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 36 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 158 log files, 34 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Nov 20, 2020

From the test results, I think that the PR is working as expected:

  • the warnings about 116{24,42}.911 workflow maps being missing are gone
  • the validateJR logs show that the new TICL variables are plotted (defaults had no differences)

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+externals

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit 7a33d9a into cms-sw:master Nov 20, 2020
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants