Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/103 update to 9.9.5 #104

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

Feature/103 update to 9.9.5 #104

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

ppxl
Copy link
Member

@ppxl ppxl commented May 31, 2024

Resolve #103

This PR also adds a lot of developer docs in order to fully test the SQ community plugin by https://github.com/mc1arke

ppxl added 5 commits June 5, 2024 08:17
This documentation was tested on a local CES. Please use it wisely it
has cost me many hours and tears.
This change allows to remove the synchronous `sleep(10)` example call
from the example Jenkinsfile SQ scan block. Instead the webhook calls
back when SQ finished and successfully notifies Jenkins this way.

Note that this notification might take in Jenkins way longer than the
actual scan takes. On my machine the scan finished under 3 seconds while
Jenkin's `waitForQualityGate()` timeout lasted 18-20 seconds to finish.
@ppxl ppxl force-pushed the feature/103_update_to_9.9.5 branch from 2d3b909 to 628e526 Compare June 5, 2024 06:17
Co-authored-by: Philipp Pixel <[email protected]>
@ppxl ppxl force-pushed the feature/103_update_to_9.9.5 branch from 776fe10 to 555585e Compare June 6, 2024 11:07
The previous documentation lacked a understandable structure because it
was written from the get-go. It also missed some crucial parts.

This commit restructures this documentation so developers unfamiliar
with the configuration of Jenkins and SonarQube in terms of the SQ
community branch plugin can better follow.

This code was almost fully written without AI (except the english
translation, sorry about that).

Co-authored-by: Florian Deeken <[email protected]>
@fdeeken fdeeken merged commit 2681c23 into develop Jun 6, 2024
1 check was pending
@fdeeken fdeeken deleted the feature/103_update_to_9.9.5 branch June 6, 2024 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upgrade sonarqube 9.9.4 to 9.9.5
2 participants