Skip to content

docs: add TweetClaw source context#12

Open
kriptoburak wants to merge 1 commit into
citedy:mainfrom
kriptoburak:codex/tweetclaw-source-context
Open

docs: add TweetClaw source context#12
kriptoburak wants to merge 1 commit into
citedy:mainfrom
kriptoburak:codex/tweetclaw-source-context

Conversation

@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Add optional TweetClaw/OpenClaw X/Twitter source-context guidance to the main README and skill docs.
  • Keep Citedy responsible for trend scouting, article generation, social adaptation, publishing, scheduling, webhooks, and analytics.
  • Keep TweetClaw write-like actions inside the TweetClaw/OpenClaw approval flow.
  • Update the root, OpenClaw, and standalone focused skill copies together to avoid packaged-skill drift.

Validation

  • Duplicate checks: local TweetClaw audit/archive, target files, GitHub code search, and open/closed PRs/issues found no prior TweetClaw or Xquik submission for this repo.
  • Target checks: MIT license, fork parent verified as citedy/citedy-seo-agent.
  • Ran git diff --check.
  • Ran npm pack --dry-run --json and confirmed the changed README and skill files are included.
  • Checked the new TweetClaw GitHub link and confirmed the OpenClaw install command appears in the changed docs.
  • Link sweep found only pre-existing target placeholder/API-root links unrelated to this PR.
  • Public-safety scan found no secrets or private implementation details in the added text.

Existing Target Drift

  • node autogpt/validate-templates.mjs currently reports pre-existing manifest count drift, missing AutoGPT template manifest entries, and duplicate action endpoint declarations. I left that unchanged because this PR only updates docs guidance.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant