Skip to content

Conversation

@rosieyohannan
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What did you change?

Reasons

Why did you make these changes?

Content Checklist

Please follow our style when contributing to CircleCI docs. Our style guide is here: https://circleci.com/docs/style/style-guide-overview.

Please take a moment to check through the following items when submitting your PR (this is just a guide so will not be relevant for all PRs):

  • Break up walls of text by adding paragraph breaks.
  • Consider if the content could benefit from more structure, such as lists or tables, to make it easier to consume.
  • Keep the title between 20 and 70 characters.
  • Consider whether the content would benefit from more subsections (h2-h6 headings) to make it easier to consume.
  • Check all headings h1-h6 are in sentence case (only first letter is capitalized).
  • Include relevant backlinks to other CircleCI docs/pages.

rosieyohannan and others added 17 commits November 4, 2025 11:20
* Add docs on how to go from 4.4 to 7.0

* style and formatting

* Add curly brackets around manual response

---------

Co-authored-by: rosie yohannan <[email protected]>
* adding client block to values.yaml

* added nomad client privateKey

* Update docs/server-admin-4.9/modules/ROOT/partials/installation/phase-3.adoc

Co-authored-by: Rosie Yohannan <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Atul S <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rosie Yohannan <[email protected]>
…ipt (#9806)

* Replace hardcoded server image list with extraction script

This script pulls the current image list from the Helm chart, keeping it up-to-date with server releases and reduce maintenance overhead.

* allow attribute substitution

* consistent syntax for substitution

---------

Co-authored-by: rosie yohannan <[email protected]>
* Update server values table for 4.9

* fix include

---------

Co-authored-by: rosie yohannan <[email protected]>
@rosieyohannan rosieyohannan marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 15:23
@rosieyohannan rosieyohannan requested review from a team as code owners December 8, 2025 15:23
Copy link
Contributor

@marcospereira-circleci marcospereira-circleci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rosieyohannan, a few minor suggestions, but nothing that blocks merging the PR.

Also, I understand that the 4.9 pages were copied from 4.8 after those changes, right? Do we need to sync those suggestions/changes back into the 4.9 pages then?

serverversion48: 4.8.5
serverversion: 3.4.8
serverversion49: 4.9.0
terraformversion: 0.15.4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we are here...

@atulsingh0, does this version still make sense? This is supposed to be the minimal version supported.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This version gets updated when patch releases go out which updates the version quoted in various places across the docs

@rosieyohannan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rosieyohannan, a few minor suggestions, but nothing that blocks merging the PR.

Also, I understand that the 4.9 pages were copied from 4.8 after those changes, right? Do we need to sync those suggestions/changes back into the 4.9 pages then?

I have one ticket actually to bring over a change from 4.8 (https://circleci.atlassian.net/browse/DOCSS-1982?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNDkxYzczMWMyOGVhNDhlOGI3NzNmM2RmYzUwYmJkZjYiLCJwIjoiaiJ9) So I will do that one today. I'll check in github for other changes that have happened in 4.8 docs since the 4.9 branch was created too

@rosieyohannan rosieyohannan merged commit 9d3e28d into main Dec 11, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@rosieyohannan rosieyohannan deleted the server-release-4.9-DOCSS-1958 branch December 11, 2025 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants