Implement custom token extractor #49
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
blablacio
force-pushed
the
custom-token-extractors
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c654d9c to
b9e7066
Compare
blablacio
force-pushed
the
custom-token-extractors
branch
from
c18e129 to
9f94a3e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've been working on a websocket API for some time and just realized that browsers still don't support setting headers like Authorization (or anything else other than Sec-WebSocket-Protocol), which makes things a little bit more complicated.
So, now I'm wondering what would be the most straightforward and flexible way to allow for custom token extraction?
I was thinking that probably adding a new
token_extractorfield onAuthorizerandAuthorizerBuilderalong with a method on the builder to allow passing an extractor function would be the easiest way to extend token extraction without touching theJwtSourceenum.Might be a good idea to skip setting the
token_extractorentirely ifjwt_sourceis passed, but not sure about that.Let me know what you think and if there's a better way to go about this.