Prepare move to MQT organization

[flowerthrower]

This PR introduces changes to the package look and feel and prepares the repository for moving into the MQT organization.

[flowerthrower]

Not sure if this PR is a bit premature, cause I just realized I am missing the rights for moving the repository to another organization anyway. I guess this will have to be done by @burgholzer or @nquetschlich.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.0%. Comparing base (90d7a41) to head (1c14327).

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #385   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   87.0%   87.0%           
=====================================
  Files         12      12           
  Lines        936     936           
=====================================
  Hits         815     815           
  Misses       121     121           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python	87.0% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[burgholzer]

Thanks for the PR. Actually not premature, but good to have ready so that we can immediately merge it after moving and everything is ready 🙂
Just one comment triggered by the file header changes 😌

[burgholzer]

This might be a good opportunity to introduce the automated license headers we also use in many other MQT repositories already.
It's basically another pre-commit check and a config file.
Then the manual file headers can be removed.