[RPGF-99] Migrate Production API Round 6 #73
Conversation
Billy19191
added
enhancement
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes across multiple components, primarily focusing on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@Billy19191 deployment failed. |
Billy19191
changed the title
|
Got it @wit03 , also skip some part about metric garden, let merge this to branch metric garden first then I will fix all stuff in that branch. |
Billy19191
added
the
ready to review
Billy19191
removed
the
ready to review
Billy19191
added
the
ready to review
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/AmountAttestation.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comment.The type change aligns with the known constraints from previous discussions. However, to maintain clarity for future developers, consider adding a JSDoc comment explaining why
anyis used here.+/** + * @property {any} impactGardenMetrics - Using 'any' type as the metrics structure + * may vary during the migration from Agora API to static dataset + */ interface iAmountAttestationProps { impactGardenMetrics: any }app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/page.tsx (2)
Line range hint
19-24: Clean up the API migration remnantsThe commented-out
getRealTimeRetroPGF6()call and its import should be removed as part of the migration to static dataset.Apply this diff to clean up:
- import { getRealTimeRetroPGF6 } from '@/app/lib/realtime' ... async function FindRound6Data( decodedString: string ): Promise<iRetroPGF6Project | undefined> { - // const data = await getRealTimeRetroPGF6() const data = await getJsonRound6()
Line range hint
53-64: Improve error handling and user feedbackThe current error handling has a few areas for improvement:
- The original error message is lost in the catch block
- The generic error message isn't very helpful for users or debugging
Consider this improved implementation:
} catch (error) { console.error('Error fetching data:', error) - let errorMessage = 'An unexpected error occurred' + const errorMessage = error instanceof Error + ? error.message + : 'An unexpected error occurred while loading the project' return ( - <div className="flex items-center justify-center h-screen"> - <div className="text-center"> - <h1 className="text-2xl font-bold mb-4">Error</h1> - <p className="text-red-500">{errorMessage}</p> - </div> - </div> + <CustomError + titleError="Error Loading Project" + subTitle={errorMessage} + desc="Please try refreshing the page or contact support if the problem persists" + /> )app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactStatementSection.tsx (3)
Line range hint
25-44: Remove commented-out code.Since this code uses the old data structure (
impactIpfs) and the changes are preserved in Git history, this commented section should be removed to improve code maintainability.
Line range hint
45-61: Multiple improvements needed for security, type safety, and semantics.Several issues need to be addressed:
- Using
dangerouslySetInnerHTMLwithout sanitization is a security risk- The
anytype should be replaced with a proper interface- Using
<a>tag for non-link text is semantically incorrect- Multiple optional chaining could be simplified
Apply these improvements:
+interface ImpactStatement { + question: string; + answer: string; +} + {Array.isArray(data.impactStatement.statement) && - data.impactStatement?.statement.length !== 0 && - data.impactStatement?.statement.map((item: any, i: number) => ( + data.impactStatement.statement.length !== 0 && + data.impactStatement.statement.map((item: ImpactStatement, i: number) => ( <div key={i} className="flex flex-col gap-y-4"> <div className="text-lg break-words font-semibold text-gray-800"> {item.question} </div> <div> {item.answer && ( - <a + <div className="text-base break-words font-normal text-gray-600 space-y-5" dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ - __html: convertMarkdownToHtml(item.answer), + __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(convertMarkdownToHtml(item.answer)), }} - ></a> + ></div> )} </div> </div> ))}Also, add DOMPurify to your dependencies and import it:
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
Data structure inconsistency detected in ImpactStatementSection
The component has inconsistent usage of the
impactStatementproperty:
- Line 42-43 checks
Array.isArray(data.impactStatement)but the type definition showsimpactStatementis an object with astatementarray- The commented out code still contains old
impactIpfsreferences- The actual implementation at lines 48-50 correctly uses
data.impactStatement.statementThe type definitions in both RetroType5.d.ts and RetroType6.d.ts show that
ImpactStatementshould be an object with:interface ImpactStatement { category: ApplicationCategoryEnum subcategory: string[] statement: Statement[] }Please update the array check to use
data.impactStatement.statementconsistently and remove the commented outimpactIpfscode.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-61: Verify data structure migration completeness.Since this is part of the migration from Agora API to static dataset (RPGF-99), let's verify that all components have been updated to use the new data structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old impactIpfs structure # and verify the new impactStatement structure usage echo "Checking for old impactIpfs references..." rg "impactIpfs" -t typescript -t tsx echo "Verifying new impactStatement structure usage..." rg "impactStatement" -t typescript -t tsxLength of output: 348
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try with correct file extensions echo "Checking for old impactIpfs references..." rg "impactIpfs" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts echo -e "\nVerifying new impactStatement structure usage..." rg "impactStatement" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts # Also check the type definitions to understand the data structure echo -e "\nChecking type definitions..." rg "interface.*RetroType|type.*RetroType" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts -A 10Length of output: 3031
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the type definitions specifically for ImpactStatement echo "Checking ImpactStatement type definitions..." rg "interface.*ImpactStatement|type.*ImpactStatement" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts -A 5 # Let's also check the actual usage in the component to verify consistency echo -e "\nChecking component implementation..." rg -A 10 "interface.*iImpactStatementSection" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t tsLength of output: 5282
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/FeelingIfNotExist.tsx (1)
The component is not processing the
feeling_if_didnt_existdata from metricsThe component has a bug where it's not processing the
feeling_if_didnt_existdata from the impactGardenMetrics prop. The parent component (ImpactGardenSection) fetches metrics that include afeeling_if_didnt_existfield, but the FeelingIfNotExist component:
- Overwrites the state with zero values in useEffect without using the metrics data
- Doesn't aggregate or count the feelings from
impactGardenMetrics.feeling_if_didnt_exist- The ReviewerListsTable component correctly displays this data for individual reviews
This needs to be fixed by processing the metrics to count the number of reviewers for each feeling category.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
31-75: Verify if zero-value metrics are intentional.The component currently displays a chart with all zero values, which might not provide meaningful information to users. Given this PR's context of migrating to static data:
- The metrics are not being processed from the input prop
- The chart always shows zero values
- The "maximum feeling" logic will always select the first item due to equal values
Let's verify if this component is used elsewhere and how the metrics should be processed:
Let me gather more context about the data processing in this component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for FeelingIfNotExist usage rg -l "FeelingIfNotExist" # Search for any hardcoded metrics data rg -A 5 "impactGardenMetrics.*="Length of output: 3004
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the parent component's implementation cat "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactGardenSection.tsx" # Look for any feeling-related data processing rg -A 5 "feeling|Feeling" --type tsLength of output: 17575
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactGardenSection.tsx (4)
Line range hint
9-31: Improve type safety and error handling in fetchImpactGardenMetrics.The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Using
anytype reduces type safety- Silently returning empty arrays may hide issues
- API URL should be configurable
Consider applying these improvements:
-async function fetchImpactGardenMetrics(projectUID: string): Promise<any> { +interface ImpactGardenMetric { + attestationUID: string; + category: string; + contribution: string; + // ... other fields +} + +async function fetchImpactGardenMetrics( + projectUID: string +): Promise<ImpactGardenMetric[]> { + const baseUrl = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_METRICS_GARDEN_API_URL; if (!baseUrl) { + throw new Error('Metrics Garden API URL not configured'); + } const query = `?primaryProjectUid=${projectUID}` const reviewListUrl = baseUrl + query try { const response = await axios - .get<any[]>(reviewListUrl) + .get<ImpactGardenMetric[]>(reviewListUrl) .then((res) => res.data) if (!response) { throw new Error('Failed to fetch impact garden metrics') } const data = response if (!Array.isArray(data)) { - return [] + throw new Error('Invalid response format') } return data } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to fetch impact garden metrics:', error) - return [] + throw error } }
Line range hint
42-63: Replace hardcoded values and improve type safety.The state management has several concerns:
- Hardcoded project UID ('123456')
- Use of
anytype for state variablesConsider these improvements:
+interface ImpactGardenState { + attestationUID: string; + category: string; + contribution: string; + // ... other fields matching the API response +} -const [impactGardenMetrics, setImpactGardenMetrics] = useState<any>([ +const [impactGardenMetrics, setImpactGardenMetrics] = useState<ImpactGardenState[]>([ { attestationUID: '', // ... keep existing initial state }, ]) -const [delegateUsers, setDelegateUsers] = useState<any>([]) -const [badgeholderUsers, setBadgeholderUsers] = useState<any>([]) +const [delegateUsers, setDelegateUsers] = useState<Array<unknown>>([]) +const [badgeholderUsers, setBadgeholderUsers] = useState<Array<unknown>>([]) -const projectUID: string = '123456' +const projectUID = data.projectRefUid
Line range hint
65-72: Simplify promise handling and improve error management.The current implementation has unnecessary complexity and inconsistent error handling:
- Using
Promise.allfor a single promise is redundant- Throwing errors in catch block defeats the purpose of catching
Consider this improvement:
useEffect(() => { - Promise.all([fetchImpactGardenMetrics(projectUID)]) - .then(([metrics]) => { + fetchImpactGardenMetrics(projectUID) + .then((metrics) => { setImpactGardenMetrics(metrics) }) .catch((err) => { - throw new Error(err) + console.error('Failed to fetch metrics:', err); + // TODO: Show error message to user }) }, [projectUID])
Line range hint
73-106: Add loading and error states, fix hardcoded URL.The component rendering could be improved with proper loading and error states:
Consider these improvements:
+ const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); + const [error, setError] = useState<Error | null>(null); useEffect(() => { + setIsLoading(true); fetchImpactGardenMetrics(projectUID) .then((metrics) => { setImpactGardenMetrics(metrics) + setError(null); }) .catch((err) => { + setError(err); }) + .finally(() => { + setIsLoading(false); + }); }, [projectUID]) return ( <section id="Impact Garden" ref={impactGardenRef} className="flex flex-col gap-6 bg-white rounded-lg p-4 lg:p-6 border" > <h3 className="text-2xl font-semibold ">Impact Garden</h3> <hr className="hidden sm:block border-t-gray-100" /> + {isLoading && <div>Loading metrics...</div>} + {error && <div className="text-red-500">Failed to load metrics: {error.message}</div>} + {!isLoading && !error && ( <div className="text-gray-500"> {/* ... existing content ... */} <Link className="font-medium text-primaryRed self-start" - href={`https://www.metricsgarden.xyz/projects/${projectUID}/?tab=insights`} + href={`https://www.metricsgarden.xyz/projects/${data.projectRefUid}/?tab=insights`} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" > View More > </Link> </div> + )}app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/DynamicCard.tsx (1)
Remove the commented reward section as it's consistently commented out across Round 6 components
The reward display functionality appears to be consistently commented out in Round 6 components, including both DynamicCard.tsx and ProjectDetailSection.tsx. While OpToken assets are still referenced in ListCard.tsx, the actual reward display sections are commented out, indicating this feature is intentionally disabled for Round 6.
Please remove the commented code to maintain code cleanliness:
- Remove lines 63-67 in DynamicCard.tsx containing the commented reward display implementation
- Also remove any unused imports related to this section (like OpToken if it's not used elsewhere in the file)
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
109-120: Verify if the reward section should be removed or enabled for round 6.Given that this PR is migrating to round 6, please clarify if:
- The reward display functionality should be enabled for round 6
- Or if this commented code should be removed as it's no longer needed
If the code is no longer needed, consider removing it to maintain code cleanliness.
Let me check the actual implementation in the other files to better understand if rewards are actively used or just commented out there as well.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if rewards are displayed in other round 6 components # This will help determine if the reward section should be enabled or removed echo "Checking for reward-related code in round 6 components..." rg -l "numberWithCommas.*reward" "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6" echo "Checking for OpToken usage in round 6 components..." rg -l "OpToken" "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6"Length of output: 658
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual implementation of rewards in the found files echo "Checking ProjectDetailSection.tsx implementation:" rg "numberWithCommas.*reward" "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ProjectDetailSection.tsx" -C 2 echo -e "\nChecking ListCard.tsx OpToken implementation:" rg "OpToken" "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/component/ListCard.tsx" -C 2Length of output: 1020
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/Cpage.tsx (2)
Line range hint
43-48: Resolve inconsistency between section registration and rendering.There's a mismatch in the logic:
- The condition at line 43 adds 'Impact Garden' to the sections array when
applicationCategory === 'GOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLING'- However, the actual rendering of
ImpactGardenSectionis commented out (lines 106-108)This will cause the ScrollSpy to show a section that isn't actually rendered on the page.
Either:
- Uncomment the ImpactGardenSection rendering, or
- Remove the section from the sections array
- if (data.applicationCategory === 'GOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLING') { - initialSections.splice(2, 0, { - name: 'Impact Garden', - ref: impactGardenRef, - }) - }Also applies to: 106-108
Line range hint
52-71: Remove commented-out Impact Metrics code.The commented-out useEffect hook and its related code for Impact Metrics should be removed if it's no longer needed. This will improve code maintainability.
- // useEffect(() => { - // if (data.impactMetrics) { - // setSections((prevSections) => { - // const impactMetricsExists = prevSections.find( - // (section) => section.name === 'Impact Metrics' - // ) - // if (!impactMetricsExists) { - // return [ - // ...prevSections.slice(0, insertAtPosition), - // { name: 'Impact Metrics', ref: impactRef }, - // ...prevSections.slice(insertAtPosition), - // ] - // } - // return prevSections - // }) - // } - // }, [data.impactMetrics])app/(transparent_navbar)/explore/_component/CardRound6.tsx (2)
94-96: Remove redundant effect prop while keeping UX improvements.The touch interaction and pagination improvements look good and align with the PR's UX enhancement goals.
Consider removing the redundant
effect="slide"prop as it's already the default behavior:allowTouchMove={true} - effect="slide" pagination={{ clickable: true }}
Line range hint
1-153: Consider enhancing accessibility for carousel navigation.While the component has good UX features, consider these accessibility improvements:
- Add ARIA labels to the Swiper container
- Enhance keyboard navigation support
- Add screen reader announcements for slide changes
Example implementation:
<Swiper + aria-label="Project carousel" + onKeyDown={(e) => { + if (e.key === 'ArrowLeft') swiper?.slidePrev() + if (e.key === 'ArrowRight') swiper?.slideNext() + }} onSwiper={setSwiper} // ... other props >app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ProjectDetailSection.tsx (1)
Line range hint
44-54: Consider documenting the commented reward sections.While the commented reward-related code is intentionally disabled (as per previous feedback), consider adding a TODO comment explaining when these sections will be re-enabled or documenting this in the component's documentation.
Example documentation:
interface iProjectDetailSection { data: iRetroPGF6Project } +// Note: Reward display is temporarily disabled until reward data becomes available +// in the static dataset migration (RPGF-99)Also applies to: 58-63, 67-76
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/ProjectTab.tsx (1)
Line range hint
380-391: Fix inconsistent DynamicCard props in mobile viewThe mobile view DynamicCard implementation has several inconsistencies with the grid view:
- Uses
round="4"instead of"6"- Missing props:
icon,banner,applicationCategory,teamSize,rewardThis could lead to rendering inconsistencies between mobile and desktop views.
Apply this diff to align with the grid view implementation:
<DynamicCard + icon={item.profileAvatarUrl ?? ''} + banner={item.projectCoverImageUrl ?? ''} category={item.category ?? ''} + applicationCategory={item.applicationCategory ?? ''} description={item.description ?? ''} title={item.name} - // opRecieve={0} - round="4" + teamSize={item.team?.length ?? 0} + round="6" isEligible={true} + reward={0} - // votes={0} - // rank={0} />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
app/(transparent_navbar)/explore/_component/CardRound6.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts(1 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/Cpage.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/FundingSection.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactGardenSection.tsx(3 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactStatementSection.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/OverviewSection.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ProjectDetailSection.tsx(1 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/AmountAttestation.tsx(1 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/AverageStar.tsx(1 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/FeelingIfNotExist.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/ReviewerListsTable.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/page.tsx(1 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/DynamicCard.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/Filter/ApplicationCategoryDisclosure.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/ProjectTab.tsx(2 hunks)app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/component/ListCard.tsx(1 hunks)public/sitemap-0.xml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- public/sitemap-0.xml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (6)
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts (1)
Learnt from: Billy19191
PR: catalyzt-tech/RetroPGF-Hub#71
File: app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts:32-48
Timestamp: 2024-10-22T21:39:39.619Z
Learning: In `app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts`, for the `ImpactGardenMetrics` interface, constraints are not clear and may change due to uncontrollable factors; therefore, strict type constraints should not be added.
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactGardenSection.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Billy19191
PR: catalyzt-tech/RetroPGF-Hub#71
File: app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactGardenSection.tsx:44-59
Timestamp: 2024-10-21T20:04:53.463Z
Learning: In the `ImpactGardenSection` component (`ImpactGardenSection.tsx`), the initial state of `impactGardenMetrics` uses keys provided by Metric Garden's API, which are in `snake_case`. These keys should not be modified to `camelCase` to ensure compatibility with the data received from Metric Garden.
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/OverviewSection.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Billy19191
PR: catalyzt-tech/RetroPGF-Hub#46
File: app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Text.ts:64-77
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T18:26:17.664Z
Learning: In `app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Text.ts`, the `applicationCategory` constant uses both `name` and `value` properties to maintain consistency with the existing codebase.
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ProjectDetailSection.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Billy19191
PR: catalyzt-tech/RetroPGF-Hub#69
File: app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ProjectDetailSection.tsx:70-80
Timestamp: 2024-10-13T19:50:27.248Z
Learning: In `ProjectDetailSection.tsx`, the `data.reward` field is currently null. The reward display section is intentionally commented out and will be updated when reward data becomes available.
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/AmountAttestation.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Billy19191
PR: catalyzt-tech/RetroPGF-Hub#71
File: app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts:32-48
Timestamp: 2024-10-22T21:39:39.619Z
Learning: In `app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts`, for the `ImpactGardenMetrics` interface, constraints are not clear and may change due to uncontrollable factors; therefore, strict type constraints should not be added.
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/ReviewerListsTable.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Billy19191
PR: catalyzt-tech/RetroPGF-Hub#71
File: app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/ReviewerListsTable.tsx:8-12
Timestamp: 2024-10-22T21:51:35.454Z
Learning: In the file `app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/ReviewerListsTable.tsx`, the `delegateUsers` and `badgeholderUsers` properties in the `iReviewerListsTable` interface are intended for future use, even if they are currently unused.
🪛 Biome
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts
[error] 186-186: Do not shadow the global "Object" property.
Consider renaming this variable. It's easy to confuse the origin of variables when they're named after a known global.
(lint/suspicious/noShadowRestrictedNames)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/AmountAttestation.tsx (1)
4-4: Verify type usage across the codebase.
Let's verify that this type change is consistent with other components using impactGardenMetrics.
✅ Verification successful
Type any is consistently used across all components
The verification shows that impactGardenMetrics is typed as any across all components where it's used:
FeelingIfNotExist.tsxAverageStar.tsxAmountAttestation.tsxReviewerListsTable.tsxImpactGardenSection.tsx(where it's initialized as state)
The type usage is consistent throughout the codebase, though using any type might not be the best practice.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for inconsistent type usage of impactGardenMetrics
# across the codebase to ensure alignment with the migration.
echo "Searching for impactGardenMetrics type definitions..."
rg -t typescript "impactGardenMetrics.*:" --glob "!{*.test.*,*.spec.*}"
echo -e "\nSearching for ImpactGardenMetrics interface usage..."
rg -t typescript "ImpactGardenMetrics[\[\]\s]" --glob "!{*.test.*,*.spec.*}"
Length of output: 460
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with different file extensions for TypeScript files
echo "Searching for impactGardenMetrics type definitions..."
rg "impactGardenMetrics.*:" --glob "*.{ts,tsx}"
echo -e "\nSearching for ImpactGardenMetrics interface usage..."
rg "ImpactGardenMetrics[\[\]\s]" --glob "*.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 989
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/OverviewSection.tsx (1)
41-41: Verify handling of application categories during migration.
The change from direct category access to using applicationCategoryMap looks good, but please verify:
- That all possible category values from the static dataset are covered in the mapping
- Whether showing an empty string for unknown categories is the desired behavior
Let's check the category values in the codebase:
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/page.tsx (1)
46-46: Verify layout changes across all viewports
The switch from fixed margins to responsive padding with w-fit/w-full is a significant layout change. Please ensure this doesn't cause content overflow or alignment issues across different screen sizes.
Consider adding snapshot tests or visual regression tests to catch potential layout issues in future changes.
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactStatementSection.tsx (1)
20-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance empty state handling robustness.
Consider adding null/undefined checks and providing a more informative message for users.
- {Array.isArray(data.impactStatement) &&
- data.impactStatement.length === 0 && (
+ {(!data.impactStatement?.statement ||
+ !Array.isArray(data.impactStatement.statement) ||
+ data.impactStatement.statement.length === 0) && (
<p className="text-base font-normal text-gray-600">
- There is no impact for this project.
+ This project has not provided any impact statements yet.
</p>
)}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/Filter/ApplicationCategoryDisclosure.tsx (1)
Line range hint 15-58: Verify consistency of application category mappings across components.
The AI summary indicates related changes in ProjectTab.tsx and OverviewSection.tsx. Let's ensure the category mappings are consistent.
✅ Verification successful
Application category mappings are inversely defined but consistent
The verification shows that both files maintain consistency in their category mappings, just with inverse key-value relationships for their specific use cases:
ApplicationCategoryDisclosure.tsxmaps display names to constants (e.g., 'Governance Analytics' → 'GOVERNANCE_ANALYTICS')OverviewSection.tsxmaps constants to display names (e.g., 'GOVERNANCE_ANALYTICS' → 'Governance Analytics')
This is actually a correct implementation pattern where the filter component needs to convert from display names to constants, while the overview component needs to convert from constants to display names.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other applicationCategoryMap definitions
rg -l "applicationCategoryMap\s*=\s*{" --type typescript
# Search for uses of these specific category constants
rg -A 2 "GOVERNANCE_ANALYTICS|GOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLING|GOVERNANCE_LEADERSHIP" --type typescript
Length of output: 319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for applicationCategoryMap definitions with fixed regex
rg "applicationCategoryMap.*="
# Search for category constants with file type flag
rg -t ts -t tsx "GOVERNANCE_ANALYTICS|GOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLING|GOVERNANCE_LEADERSHIP"
# Search for files containing "category" in their name
fd -e ts -e tsx category
Length of output: 1461
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both files containing applicationCategoryMap
cat "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/OverviewSection.tsx" "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/Filter/ApplicationCategoryDisclosure.tsx"
# Check if there's a central category definition
cat "app/lib/category.ts"
Length of output: 5061
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/component/ListCard.tsx (2)
Line range hint 89-93: LGTM! Good error state handling.
The empty state message provides clear feedback to users when no items are found.
43-43: Verify the interface change across components.
The property rename from projectAvatarUrl to profileAvatarUrl is part of a breaking change. While the change itself looks correct, we should ensure consistency across all components.
Let's verify the interface change implementation:
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/ReviewerListsTable.tsx (2)
57-94:
Add property access safety checks.
The current implementation assumes all properties exist on the impactGardenMetric object. Since we're using any type, TypeScript won't catch missing properties at compile time. Consider:
- Adding null checks for critical properties
- Providing fallback values
- Adding runtime validation for the data structure
Let's check the data structure being used:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the shape of impact garden metrics data
rg -t typescript "impactGardenMetrics.*=" -A 5Example safer implementation:
- <tr key={impactGardenMetric.id}>
+ <tr key={impactGardenMetric?.id ?? index}>
<td className="px-6 py-4 whitespace-nowrap text-sm font-normal text-gray-600">
{index + 1}
</td>
<td className="px-6 py-4 whitespace-nowrap">
<div className="flex items-center">
<div className="flex-shrink-0 h-7 w-7">
<Image
className="h-7 w-7 rounded-full"
- src={impactGardenMetric.pfp}
+ src={impactGardenMetric?.pfp ?? '/default-avatar.png'}
alt="Profile Picture"
width={25}
height={25}
/>
</div>
<div className="ml-3">
<div className="text-sm font-medium text-neutral-900">
- {impactGardenMetric.username}
+ {impactGardenMetric?.username ?? 'Anonymous'}
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td className="px-6 py-4 whitespace-nowrap text-sm font-normal text-gray-600">
<div className="flex items-center gap-x-1">
- {Number(impactGardenMetric.likely_to_recommend) / 2}
+ {(impactGardenMetric?.likely_to_recommend ? Number(impactGardenMetric.likely_to_recommend) / 2 : 0).toFixed(1)}
<RiStarFill size={15} color="#FFC55A" />
</div>
</td>5-7: Consider maintaining type safety instead of using any.
While using any types might facilitate the migration process, it bypasses TypeScript's type checking and could lead to runtime errors. Consider:
- Defining proper interfaces for the migrated static data structure
- Using temporary type aliases during migration
- Adding TODO comments with timeline for restoring type safety
Let's check if there are type definitions we could reuse:
✅ Verification successful
Let's search for existing type definitions and usage patterns to understand if we can reuse any existing types or need to define new ones.
Let's try searching without file type restrictions and also locate the specific file to understand its context better.
Based on the search results, I can see that there are existing interfaces defined for impact metrics in the codebase, specifically ImpactMetrics in both RetroType4.d.ts and RetroType6.d.ts. Let me generate one more search to understand the full structure of these interfaces.
This will help us understand the exact structure of the existing interfaces that we can reuse or extend.
Consider using the existing ImpactMetrics interface from RetroType6.d.ts instead of any
Looking at the codebase, there's a well-defined ImpactMetrics interface in RetroType6.d.ts that matches your use case. For the other types, you can use the existing interfaces:
interface iReviewerListsTable {
impactGardenMetrics: ImpactMetrics // from RetroType6.d.ts
delegateUsers: BadgeholderMetrics[] // from RetroType4.d.ts
badgeholderUsers: BadgeholderMetrics[] // from RetroType4.d.ts
}This will provide proper type safety and better code maintainability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing type definitions related to impact garden metrics
rg -t typescript "interface.*ImpactGarden"
Length of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for type definitions or usages of these properties
rg -t ts -t tsx "impactGardenMetrics|delegateUsers|badgeholderUsers" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for any type definitions that might be relevant
rg -t ts -t tsx "type.*Metrics|interface.*Metrics|type.*User|interface.*User" -B 1 -A 3
Length of output: 226
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search without file type restrictions since ts/tsx aren't recognized
rg "impactGardenMetrics|delegateUsers|badgeholderUsers" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for type definitions in any file
rg "type.*Metrics|interface.*Metrics|type.*User|interface.*User" -B 1 -A 3
# Find the specific file to understand its context
fd "ReviewerListsTable.tsx"
Length of output: 140651
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the type definition files
cat "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts"
cat "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF4/RetroType4.d.ts"
Length of output: 7140
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/Cpage.tsx (2)
90-119: LGTM! Layout structure improvements.
The new layout structure with flex utilities and responsive classes enhances the organization and maintainability of the component.
43-43: Verify data structure migration completeness.
Let's ensure all references to the old data structure (impactIpfs.category) have been updated to use applicationCategory.
✅ Verification successful
Data structure migration appears complete and consistent
The search results confirm that:
- No references to the old data structure (
impactIpfs.category) exist in the codebase - The new
applicationCategoryfield is consistently used across both RPGF5 and RPGF6 static datasets and components - The specific usage in
Cpage.tsxaligns with the RPGF6 data structure whereGOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLINGis a valid category value
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old data structure
echo "Checking for old data structure references..."
rg "impactIpfs\.category"
echo "Verifying consistent usage of new structure..."
rg "applicationCategory"
Length of output: 21492
app/(transparent_navbar)/explore/_component/CardRound6.tsx (1)
120-120: Verify profile avatar migration completeness.
The change from projectAvatarUrl to profileAvatarUrl is consistent with changes across other components, but we should ensure the data migration is complete.
Let's verify the interface change and usage:
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/FundingSection.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-150: Verify data consistency after API migration.
Given that this PR migrates from Agora API to a static dataset and involves financial data display, please ensure:
- All funding amounts are correctly transferred and formatted
- The static dataset maintains the same structure for all funding types
- Edge cases (empty/null values) are handled consistently
Let's verify the data structure consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response:
Data structure consistency is maintained after API migration
The code review shows that:
- The type definitions in RetroType6.d.ts properly define all funding data structures
- The FundingSection component correctly handles all funding types (ventureFunding, grants, retroFunding, revenue)
- Edge cases are properly handled with null checks and optional chaining
- The data format is consistent with previous RPGF versions (4 and 5) as seen in the implementation comparisons
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by the funding data structure changes
rg -l "grantsAndFunding" --type typescript
# Look for potential inconsistencies in handling of funding properties
ast-grep --pattern 'grantsAndFunding.$_'
Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by the funding data structure changes
rg -l "grantsAndFunding"
# Look for the type definition to verify data structure
rg "interface.*RetroType6" -A 20
# Check for any other components using similar funding data structures
rg "funding.*interface" -A 10
Length of output: 18580
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the type definitions for funding data structure
rg -A 20 "interface.*RetroType6" app/\(white_navbar\)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts
# Check the implementation in other RPGF versions
rg -A 10 "grantsAndFunding" app/\(white_navbar\)/explore/RetroPGF*/\[name\]/_component/_Project/FundingSection.tsx
Length of output: 17398
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the static data structure in rpgf6.json
rg -A 10 '"grantsAndFunding":\s*{' public/static/rpgf6/rpgf6.json
# Check the type definition for RetroType6
cat app/\(white_navbar\)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts
Length of output: 4540
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ProjectDetailSection.tsx (1)
33-33: Verify interface compatibility for profileAvatarUrl.
The property change from projectAvatarUrl to profileAvatarUrl aligns with the migration effort. However, since this is a breaking change, we should verify the interface compatibility.
Let's verify the interface definition and usage:
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/_component/Tab/ProjectTab.tsx (2)
146-146: LGTM: Filtering logic updated correctly for Round 6
The change to use item.applicationCategory aligns with the updated data structure for Round 6.
321-329: Verify DynamicCard prop types compatibility
The prop updates align with Round 6 data structure changes. However, let's verify the prop types in the DynamicCard component to ensure compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the DynamicCard component definition since it wasn't found in the first search.
Let me try a different search pattern to locate the DynamicCard component and its props.
Props are compatible with DynamicCard component
The verification shows that all props passed to DynamicCard in RetroPGF6 are properly typed and match the interface definition:
iconaccepts string (profileAvatarUrl is passed with nullish coalescing)banner,category,applicationCategory,description,title, andteamSizeare all defined in the iDynamicCard interfaceroundprop accepts string type and "6" is valid
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify DynamicCard component prop types
# Look for DynamicCard component definition and its prop types
ast-grep --pattern 'interface DynamicCardProps {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any other usage of profileAvatarUrl to ensure consistency
rg 'profileAvatarUrl'
Length of output: 24696
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DynamicCard component definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const DynamicCard = $$$'
# Also search for any type definitions or interfaces related to DynamicCard
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
icon?: $_
banner?: $_
category?: $_
applicationCategory?: $_
description?: $_
title: $_
teamSize?: $_
round?: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 221
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing DynamicCard
fd DynamicCard
# Search for DynamicCard usage and definition
rg -A 5 "DynamicCard"
# Search for any props interface or type definition
rg -A 10 "type.*DynamicCard|interface.*DynamicCard"
Length of output: 21371
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/RetroType6.d.ts (1)
167-167:
Rename 'Object' enum and its usages to avoid shadowing the global 'Object'
Using Object as the name of an enum shadows the global Object in JavaScript/TypeScript, which can lead to confusion and potential errors. It's recommended to rename the enum and its references to avoid this issue.
Apply this diff to rename the enum and update its usage:
- export enum Object {
+ export enum TeamObjectType {
User = 'user',
}
export interface Team {
fid: number
- object: Object
+ object: TeamObjectType
pfp_url: string
profile: Profile
// ...
}Also applies to: 186-186
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: wit03
PR: catalyzt-tech/RetroPGF-Hub#43
File: app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF5/RetroType5.d.ts:130-150
Timestamp: 2024-10-02T04:07:26.891Z
Learning: When working with interfaces derived from the Agora API response, such as `Team` and `User` in `RetroType5.d.ts`, property names must remain as they are and cannot be changed to standardize naming conventions.
|
|
||
| interface iAverageStarProps { | ||
| impactGardenMetrics: ImpactGardenMetrics[] | null | ||
| impactGardenMetrics: any |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using 'any' type for impactGardenMetrics.
Using any bypasses TypeScript's type checking benefits and could lead to runtime errors. Since this is a migration to static data, we should define a proper interface.
Consider defining a specific type:
- impactGardenMetrics: any
+ impactGardenMetrics: {
+ likely_to_recommend: number;
+ // add other required fields
+ }[] | nullCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| return acc + (isNaN(score) ? 0 : score) | ||
| }, 0) / impactGardenMetrics.length | ||
| : 0 | ||
| const averageScore: number = 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Hardcoded averageScore = 0 needs to be calculated from impactGardenMetrics
The component receives impactGardenMetrics as a prop which contains an array of metrics including likely_to_recommend scores from the Impact Garden API, but it's not using this data to calculate the average score. Instead of hardcoding to 0, it should calculate the average from the likely_to_recommend values in the metrics array.
app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/AverageStar.tsx: Replace hardcoded 0 with actual average calculation fromimpactGardenMetrics.likely_to_recommendvalues
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify if hardcoding averageScore to 0 is intentional.
Setting a fixed score of 0/10 could be misleading to users viewing project recommendations. If this is temporary during migration, please add a TODO comment explaining the rationale.
Let's check if this component is used elsewhere and if other components also have hardcoded metrics:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using hardcoded metrics
rg -l "averageScore.*=.*0" --type typescript
# Check for other components importing AverageStar
rg -l "import.*AverageStar" --type typescript
Length of output: 164
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using hardcoded metrics with .ts and .tsx extensions
rg -l "averageScore.*=.*0" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"
# Check for other components importing AverageStar
rg -l "import.*AverageStar" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"
# Get the content of AverageStar component to understand its usage
cat "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/component/AverageStar.tsx"
Length of output: 1260
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the ImpactGardenSection to see how the metrics are passed
cat "app/(white_navbar)/explore/RetroPGF6/[name]/_component/_Project/ImpactGardenSection.tsx"
# Let's also search for any TODO comments related to metrics or ratings
rg "TODO.*(\bmetric|\brating|\bscore)" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"
Length of output: 3533
| const applicationCategoryMap: { [key: string]: string } = { | ||
| GOVERNANCE_ANALYTICS: 'Governance Analytics', | ||
| GOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLING: 'Governance Infra & Tooling', | ||
| GOVERNANCE_LEADERSHIP: 'Governance Leadership', | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing type safety and maintainability of category mapping.
The applicationCategoryMap could benefit from the following improvements:
- Use an enum or union type for category keys to ensure type safety
- Move to a shared constants file if used across components
- Consider i18n for display labels
Here's a suggested implementation:
// types/categories.ts
export const ApplicationCategory = {
GOVERNANCE_ANALYTICS: 'GOVERNANCE_ANALYTICS',
GOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLING: 'GOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLING',
GOVERNANCE_LEADERSHIP: 'GOVERNANCE_LEADERSHIP',
} as const;
export type ApplicationCategoryKey = keyof typeof ApplicationCategory;
// constants/categories.ts
export const applicationCategoryMap: Record<ApplicationCategoryKey, string> = {
GOVERNANCE_ANALYTICS: 'Governance Analytics',
GOVERNANCE_INFRA_AND_TOOLING: 'Governance Infra & Tooling',
GOVERNANCE_LEADERSHIP: 'Governance Leadership',
};| @@ -29,7 +28,7 @@ export const titleMap: { | |||
| export default function FeelingIfNotExist({ | |||
| impactGardenMetrics, | |||
| }: { | |||
| impactGardenMetrics: ImpactGardenMetrics[] | null | |||
| impactGardenMetrics: any | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using any type - define proper interface instead.
Using any bypasses TypeScript's type checking benefits. Since this is a migration to static data, we should define a proper interface for the metrics.
Consider defining and using a specific interface:
interface ImpactMetric {
feeling: string;
count: number;
}
// Update prop type
impactGardenMetrics: ImpactMetric[];| const updatedArray = [ | ||
| { name: '🙂 Neutral', y: 0 }, | ||
| { name: '🫠 Somewhat Upset', y: 0 }, | ||
| { name: '😭 Extremely Upset', y: 0 }, | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize static array initialization.
The current implementation unnecessarily recreates the array on every render and doesn't use the impactGardenMetrics dependency.
Consider moving the static array outside the component or using useMemo:
const INITIAL_FEELINGS = [
{ name: '🙂 Neutral', y: 0 },
{ name: '🫠 Somewhat Upset', y: 0 },
{ name: '😭 Extremely Upset', y: 0 },
] as const;
// Inside component
const [feelingArray, setFeelingArray] = useState(INITIAL_FEELINGS);| {ifNotExistMapPassage[ | ||
| impactGardenMetric.feeling_if_didnt_exist as keyof typeof ifNotExistMapPassage | ||
| ] ?? ifNotExistMapPassage.Unknown} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add type validation for feeling_if_didnt_exist.
The type assertion as keyof typeof ifNotExistMapPassage could fail at runtime if the value isn't one of the expected keys.
- {ifNotExistMapPassage[
- impactGardenMetric.feeling_if_didnt_exist as keyof typeof ifNotExistMapPassage
- ] ?? ifNotExistMapPassage.Unknown}
+ {Object.keys(ifNotExistMapPassage).includes(impactGardenMetric?.feeling_if_didnt_exist)
+ ? ifNotExistMapPassage[impactGardenMetric.feeling_if_didnt_exist as keyof typeof ifNotExistMapPassage]
+ : ifNotExistMapPassage.Unknown}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {ifNotExistMapPassage[ | |
| impactGardenMetric.feeling_if_didnt_exist as keyof typeof ifNotExistMapPassage | |
| ] ?? ifNotExistMapPassage.Unknown} | |
| {Object.keys(ifNotExistMapPassage).includes(impactGardenMetric?.feeling_if_didnt_exist) | |
| ? ifNotExistMapPassage[impactGardenMetric.feeling_if_didnt_exist as keyof typeof ifNotExistMapPassage] | |
| : ifNotExistMapPassage.Unknown} |
| {data.grantsAndFunding.retroFunding?.length != 0 && | ||
| data.grantsAndFunding.retroFunding?.map((item, i) => ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance null checking and array handling.
While the optional chaining is good, there are several improvements we can make:
- Apply consistent null checking across all funding types
- Add null checking for array items
- Consider extracting repeated funding rendering logic
Consider refactoring to this pattern for all funding types:
const renderFunding = (
items?: Array<{amount: string, details?: string}>,
title: string
) => {
if (!items?.length) return null;
return items.map((item, i) => (
item && (
<div
className="flex flex-col gap-1 px-8 py-6 bg-slate-50 rounded-lg"
key={i}
>
<div className="flex flex-wrap gap-3 items-center">
<p className="mb-1 text-lg font-semibold font-rubik">
{title}
</p>
<p className="flex flex-grow"></p>
<p className="mb-1 text-base font-medium text-gray-600 font-rubik">
{containsOnlyDigits(item.amount)
? numberWithCommas(item.amount) + ' OP'
: formatGrant(item.amount) + ' USD'}
</p>
</div>
{item.details && (
<p className="text-sm text-gray-500">{item.details}</p>
)}
</div>
)
));
};Then use it like:
{renderFunding(data.grantsAndFunding.retroFunding, 'Retro Funding')}| @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ export default function FundingSection({ data, fundingRef }: iFundingSection) { | |||
| <hr className="hidden sm:block border-t-gray-100" /> | |||
| {data.grantsAndFunding.ventureFunding.length == 0 && | |||
| data.grantsAndFunding.grants.length == 0 && | |||
| data.grantsAndFunding.retroFunding.length == 0 && | |||
| data.grantsAndFunding.retroFunding?.length == 0 && | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent null checking across all funding properties.
While adding optional chaining for retroFunding is good, the other funding properties (ventureFunding, grants, revenue) should also use optional chaining for consistency and to prevent potential runtime errors during the API migration.
Apply this pattern across all funding checks:
-data.grantsAndFunding.ventureFunding.length == 0 &&
-data.grantsAndFunding.grants.length == 0 &&
+data.grantsAndFunding.ventureFunding?.length == 0 &&
+data.grantsAndFunding.grants?.length == 0 &&
data.grantsAndFunding.retroFunding?.length == 0 &&
-data.grantsAndFunding.revenue.length == 0
+data.grantsAndFunding.revenue?.length == 0Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| export enum ActiveStatus { | ||
| Inactive = 'inactive', | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing 'Active' status to the 'ActiveStatus' enum
The ActiveStatus enum currently includes only Inactive. If team members can also have an active status, consider adding Active to represent all possible states accurately.
Apply this diff to include Active in the enum:
export enum ActiveStatus {
Inactive = 'inactive',
+ Active = 'active',
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export enum ActiveStatus { | |
| Inactive = 'inactive', | |
| } | |
| export enum ActiveStatus { | |
| Inactive = 'inactive', | |
| Active = 'active', | |
| } |
| export interface ImpactMetrics { | ||
| count_total_attestations: number | ||
| count_citizen_attestations: number | ||
| count_delegate_attestations?: number | ||
| avg_nps_score: number | ||
| most_positive_superlative: boolean | ||
| cant_live_without_superlative: boolean | ||
| percentage_distributions: PercentageDistributions | ||
| elected_governance_reviews: ElectedGovernanceReviews | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider strict type constraints in the ImpactMetrics interface
As previously noted, the constraints for ImpactMetrics are not clear and may change due to uncontrollable factors. To maintain flexibility, consider making properties optional or using more permissive types like number | null.
Apply this diff to adjust the property types:
export interface ImpactMetrics {
count_total_attestations: number
count_citizen_attestations: number
- count_delegate_attestations?: number
+ count_delegate_attestations?: number | null
avg_nps_score: number
most_positive_superlative: boolean
cant_live_without_superlative: boolean
percentage_distributions: PercentageDistributions
elected_governance_reviews: ElectedGovernanceReviews
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export interface ImpactMetrics { | |
| count_total_attestations: number | |
| count_citizen_attestations: number | |
| count_delegate_attestations?: number | |
| avg_nps_score: number | |
| most_positive_superlative: boolean | |
| cant_live_without_superlative: boolean | |
| percentage_distributions: PercentageDistributions | |
| elected_governance_reviews: ElectedGovernanceReviews | |
| } | |
| export interface ImpactMetrics { | |
| count_total_attestations: number | |
| count_citizen_attestations: number | |
| count_delegate_attestations?: number | null | |
| avg_nps_score: number | |
| most_positive_superlative: boolean | |
| cant_live_without_superlative: boolean | |
| percentage_distributions: PercentageDistributions | |
| elected_governance_reviews: ElectedGovernanceReviews | |
| } |
Description
What
Since sign up and review period of retro funding round 6 already end, we're migrate data to static from Agora API
Why
The dataset more up to date and filter ineligible project out for faster SEO and UX of user when landing to page.
Type of change
Please check the relevent option with
x.Checklist:
Local Machine