correct callout type

[karenword]

This quote is not a testimonial.

Fixing this one only, but note that there may be other errors of this kind, because the prior template did not label the callouts and were sometimes selected based on color rather than strict categorical matching!

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/carpentries/instructor-training/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-1605

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 02-practice-learning.md | 2 +-
 md5sum.txt              | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2023-10-20 21:52:18 +0000

[dpshelio]

I think that's the only one, the other two seems real.

instructor-training/episodes on karenword-patch-2 
❯ rg -A 5 testimonial
02-practice-learning.md
434::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::  testimonial
435-
436-If someone feels it is too slow, they will be a bit bored. If they feel it is too fast, they will never come back to programming.
437-— Kunal Marwaha, SWC Instructor
438-
439-

08-motivation.md
184::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::  testimonial
185-
186-## Typos
187-
188-The typos are the pedagogy.
189-— Emily Jane McTavish

[ndporter]

I'm going to merge this as-is, but I made an issue (#1608 ) to check the type/structure of various special sections and ensure it's consistent. I think this is probably low-priority, but it's there as a reminder.