added ExecutorWrapper in WorkerFactoryOptions #988
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
shijiesheng
requested review from
Groxx,
abhishekj720,
natemort,
dkrotx,
taylanisikdemir and
demirkayaender
as code owners
shijiesheng
changed the title
natemort
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
Why?
By wrapping the ExecutorWrapper, it is now possible to propagate "root" context in background polling and task executions. Uber internally built a threadlocal storage to propagate context inside executors.
How did you test it?
Unit Test
WIP internal test samples on context propagation
Potential risks
No risk due to it's a new fiel with fallback on original behavior
Release notes
Documentation Changes