Skip to content

refactor(task-board-panel): migrate 26 bare fetch to apiFetch#689

Open
jun261930-tech wants to merge 2 commits into
builderz-labs:mainfrom
jun261930-tech:migrate/task-board-panel
Open

refactor(task-board-panel): migrate 26 bare fetch to apiFetch#689
jun261930-tech wants to merge 2 commits into
builderz-labs:mainfrom
jun261930-tech:migrate/task-board-panel

Conversation

@jun261930-tech
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Migrated 26 bare fetch() calls in src/components/panels/task-board-panel.tsx to apiFetch<T>() from @/lib/api-client.

Changes

  • All GET requests: fetch(url).then(r => r.json())apiFetch<T>(url)
  • All mutation requests: fetch(url, {...})apiFetch<Response>(url, {...})
  • Eliminates redundant manual res.ok checks (apiFetch handles 401/403/5xx uniformly)
  • Eliminates need for explicit Promise.all type unions (apiFetch infers from T)
  • Fixes type narrowing for schedule-related fields

Testing

  • pnpm test passed (vitest 8/8)
  • pnpm lint passed (0 errors)
  • pnpm typecheck passed (0 errors)

Notes

P1 of MC code-quality plan (see PLAN.md / PR-api-client.md):

- src/lib/api-client.ts          (+120) ApiError + apiFetch<T> wrapper
- src/lib/__tests__/api-client.test.ts (+108) 8 vitest cases (200/401/403/500/network/loop/204/no-redirect)
- src/components/auth-expired-listener.tsx (+30) global mc:auth-expired -> /login redirect
- src/app/layout.tsx             (+2) register listener
- eslint.config.mjs              (+31) no-restricted-syntax warn for bare fetch('/api/...')

Quality gates passed:
- pnpm vitest run src/lib/__tests__/api-client.test.ts: 8/8 (2.5s)
- pnpm typecheck: 0 error
- pnpm lint: 0 error, 343 warn (~baseline 334 bare fetch + 9 pre-existing)

Out of scope: migrating existing 334 bare fetch sites (P2, separate PR).

P0 verification: playwright captured 19/19 /api/* returning 200 after login,
ruling out backend issue (cookie expired) — see p0-network-evidence.txt.
@jun261930-tech jun261930-tech requested a review from 0xNyk as a code owner May 17, 2026 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant