Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for visionOS #1625

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Add support for visionOS #1625

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

bcherry
Copy link
Contributor

@bcherry bcherry commented Feb 2, 2024

Goal

Currently you cannot use Bugsnag in a native visionOS app. We'd like to be able to offer a visionOS version of a native iOS app which uses Bugsnag.

Design

I modeled this off the way that tvOS is integrated, for the most part, as a separate framework.

Changeset

Add compiler macros to support visionOS builds.
Add visionOS framework target.

Testing

Testing has been lightweight so far, I'd imagine that Bugsnag themselves would like to own serious testing of new platform support.

@clr182 clr182 added feature request Request for a new feature backlog We hope to fix this feature/bug in the future labels Feb 8, 2024
@clr182
Copy link

clr182 commented Feb 8, 2024

Hi @bcherry

Thank you for opening this PR for visionOS support. We do have an item on our backlog aimed at adding this support.
When priority allows we will review this PR and look to merge this into our release.

We will be sure to keep you updated with any new information regarding this new platform support.

@tomlongridge
Copy link
Contributor

These changes have now been merged into #1660 to provide some basic support for visionOS in the latest release (v6.29.0). Thanks for your input @bcherry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backlog We hope to fix this feature/bug in the future feature request Request for a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants