Skip to content

[Docs] Require color rationale in PR descriptions#53

Draft
roo-code-bruno[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/require-color-rationale-in-prs-3ap31mjrncg43
Draft

[Docs] Require color rationale in PR descriptions#53
roo-code-bruno[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/require-color-rationale-in-prs-3ap31mjrncg43

Conversation

@roo-code-bruno
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Opened on behalf of Bruno Bergher. View the task or mention @roo-code-bruno for follow-up asks.

What problem this solves

Resolves a documentation gap where pull requests can introduce hard-coded color values without explaining why the value was chosen, which selectors it affects, or whether the affected text still meets contrast requirements.

Why this change was made

This adds a root AGENTS.md rule that requires PR descriptions to document hard-coded color choices with their rationale or source, the affected selectors, and a contrast confirmation. It directly addresses the review friction called out around Roo-Preview-Rails PR #52.

User impact

Reviewers can assess hard-coded color changes from the PR body instead of reconstructing intent from the diff. This is a documentation-only change and does not alter runtime app behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant