A versioned prompt library with evals for Python teams.
prompt-registry helps you store prompts as versioned artifacts, load them from disk, compare revisions, render them with variables, and run lightweight evaluations against expected behaviors.
It is designed for teams who want a simple, inspectable workflow for prompt development without depending on a database or a hosted prompt platform.
- Versioned prompt files in YAML.
- Prompt metadata, tags, owners, and changelogs.
- Variable validation for required inputs.
- Prompt rendering with safe placeholder checking.
- Registry loader for folders of prompts.
- Semantic prompt references like
support/refund_request@1.2.0. - Evals with exact, contains, regex, and callable checks.
- Snapshot-style regression testing for prompt outputs.
- Simple CLI for listing, showing, diffing, and evaluating prompts.
- Pure Python project with low friction local adoption.
pip install -e .Create a prompt file:
id: support/refund_request
version: 1.0.0
name: Refund Request Triage
owners:
- Brandon Himpfen
summary: Triage a customer refund request and decide next action.
variables:
customer_name:
description: Customer full name
required: true
order_id:
description: Order identifier
required: true
message:
description: Customer message body
required: true
prompt:
system: |
You are a careful support operations assistant.
Review the refund request and recommend the next step.
user: |
Customer: {customer_name}
Order ID: {order_id}
Message: {message}
changelog:
- version: 1.0.0
date: 2026-03-31
notes: Initial prompt.Load and render it:
from prompt_registry import PromptRegistry
registry = PromptRegistry.from_path("prompts")
prompt = registry.get("support/refund_request@1.0.0")
rendered = prompt.render(
customer_name="Taylor Smith",
order_id="ORD-1042",
message="My package arrived damaged and I want a refund.",
)
print(rendered.system)
print(rendered.user)Run evals:
python -m prompt_registry.cli eval --prompts prompts --evals examples/evals/support_refund_request.yamlEach prompt is a YAML file with this basic structure:
id: namespace/name
version: 1.0.0
name: Human readable name
owners:
- Team or owner
summary: One-line summary
variables:
variable_name:
description: What this value means
required: true
prompt:
system: |
System prompt text with {variables}
user: |
User prompt text with {variables}
metadata:
model_family: gpt
risk_level: low
use_case: support
changelog:
- version: 1.0.0
date: 2026-03-31
notes: Initial release.Evals are YAML files with named test cases:
prompt: support/refund_request@1.0.0
cases:
- id: asks_for_decision
input:
customer_name: Taylor Smith
order_id: ORD-1042
message: My package arrived damaged and I want a refund.
assertions:
- type: contains
target: user
value: Taylor Smith
- type: contains
target: user
value: ORD-1042List prompts:
python -m prompt_registry.cli list --prompts promptsShow a prompt:
python -m prompt_registry.cli show --prompts prompts --ref support/refund_request@1.0.0Diff two prompt versions:
python -m prompt_registry.cli diff --prompts prompts \
--left support/refund_request@1.0.0 \
--right support/refund_request@1.1.0Evaluate prompt cases:
python -m prompt_registry.cli eval --prompts prompts --evals examples/evals/support_refund_request.yamlprompt-registry/
├── docs/
├── examples/
├── prompts/
├── src/prompt_registry/
├── tests/
├── pyproject.toml
└── README.md
This project is useful when you want prompt engineering to behave more like software engineering:
- prompts live in version control.
- revisions are explicit.
- diffs are readable.
- tests are repeatable.
- teams can review prompt changes before shipping them.
MIT