Skip to content

BM-592: Tests for when client withdraws funds before fulfill #360

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 8, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
65 changes: 65 additions & 0 deletions contracts/test/BoundlessMarket.t.sol
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1346,6 +1346,47 @@ contract BoundlessMarketBasicTest is BoundlessMarketTest {
return (request, otherProver);
}

function testFulfillWasLockedClientWithdrawsBalance() public {
Client client = getClient(1);
ProofRequest memory request = client.request(
1,
Offer({
minPrice: 1 ether,
maxPrice: 2 ether,
biddingStart: uint64(block.number),
rampUpPeriod: uint32(50),
lockTimeout: uint32(50),
timeout: uint32(100),
lockStake: 1 ether
})
);
bytes memory clientSignature = client.sign(request);

address clientAddress = client.addr();
vm.prank(clientAddress);
boundlessMarket.lockRequest(request, clientSignature);

uint256 balance = boundlessMarket.balanceOf(clientAddress);
vm.prank(clientAddress);
boundlessMarket.withdraw(balance);

// Advance the chain ahead to simulate the lock timeout.
vm.roll(uint64(block.number) + request.offer.lockTimeout + 1);

(Fulfillment memory fill, AssessorReceipt memory assessorReceipt) =
createFillAndSubmitRoot(request, APP_JOURNAL, testProverAddress);

// NOTE: While the lock does have enough funds escrowed to cover the original price, the auction further
// raised the price in the time that passed between the lock transaction and this fulfill transaction. As a
// result, the escrowed funds are no longer sufficient.
vm.expectEmit(true, true, true, true);
emit IBoundlessMarket.PaymentRequirementsFailed(
abi.encodeWithSelector(IBoundlessMarket.InsufficientBalance.selector, clientAddress)
);
boundlessMarket.priceAndFulfill(request, clientSignature, fill, assessorReceipt);
expectRequestFulfilled(fill.id);
}

// Scenario when a prover locks a request, fails to deliver it within the lock expiry,
// but does deliver it before the request expires. Here they should lose their stake,
// but receive payment for the request.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1837,6 +1878,30 @@ contract BoundlessMarketBasicTest is BoundlessMarketTest {
return (client, request);
}

function testFulfillNeverLockedClientWithdrawsBalance() public {
Client client = getClient(1);
ProofRequest memory request = client.request(1);
bytes memory clientSignature = client.sign(request);

address clientAddress = client.addr();

(Fulfillment memory fill, AssessorReceipt memory assessorReceipt) =
createFillAndSubmitRoot(request, APP_JOURNAL, testProverAddress);

uint256 balance = boundlessMarket.balanceOf(clientAddress);
vm.prank(clientAddress);
boundlessMarket.withdraw(balance);

// expect emit of payment requirement failed
vm.expectEmit(true, true, true, true);
emit IBoundlessMarket.PaymentRequirementsFailed(
abi.encodeWithSelector(IBoundlessMarket.InsufficientBalance.selector, clientAddress)
);
vm.prank(clientAddress);
boundlessMarket.priceAndFulfill(request, clientSignature, fill, assessorReceipt);
expectRequestFulfilled(fill.id);
}

function testFulfillNeverLockedRequestMultipleRequestsSameIndex() public {
_testFulfillRepeatIndex(LockRequestMethod.None);
}
Expand Down
Loading