Skip to content

Conversation

@hgrov52
Copy link

@hgrov52 hgrov52 commented Apr 3, 2018

Make sure all the right functions have been moved and that the code is properly refactored intuitively.

@ghost ghost assigned hgrov52 Apr 3, 2018
@ghost ghost added the in progress label Apr 3, 2018
@colatkinson colatkinson self-requested a review April 3, 2018 20:26
Copy link
Member

@colatkinson colatkinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently does not pass Travis, and there are some syntax errors in txs.ts at a minimum. Also, can you guys merge in the latest master?

@ghost ghost assigned colatkinson Apr 3, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #65 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 98.52%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #65   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.85%   98.85%           
=======================================
  Files           6       10    +4     
  Lines         438      438           
  Branches       69       69           
=======================================
  Hits          433      433           
  Misses          5        5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/txs.ts 93.02% <ø> (-4.19%) ⬇️
lib/verify.ts 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
lib/tx-lock.ts 100% <100%> (ø)
lib/tx-commit.ts 100% <100%> (ø)
lib/tx-generate.ts 100% <100%> (ø)
lib/tx-unlock.ts 94.11% <94.11%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 88a4caf...ab746ae. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants