Skip to content

trigger build #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

trigger build #2

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
650daa7
trigger build
jrakibi Aug 18, 2025
57a67f0
trigger build
jrakibi Aug 18, 2025
ee2ea4f
trigger build 3
jrakibi Aug 18, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions ...bitcoin/hong-kong-2015/a-bevy-of-block-size-proposals-bip100-bip102-and-more.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -91,19 +91,20 @@ A: That's reasonable. You are going to be rolling out a patch, which says 6 mont

Q: In one of those slides, you said 75% levels, so 750 out of 1000 blocks. That was bip101. What is your optimal choice for that? Is it 75% 80% 90%?


A: That's why we're leaning towards flag day with non-binding miner voting. It's to avoid picking a specific number. You want to have a clear majority of hashpower on the fork that users prefer. I don't want to pick a number. I don't have a number. It's just a supermajority of the hashpower. That's step 2. But step 1 is the users agreeing by running the new software.

Q: Would you break SPV clients in a hard-fork?

A: Potentially, if that needs to be done.
A: Potentially, if that needs to be done

Q: Would you deliberately do it?

A: No. I want to maintain backwards-compatibility if at all possible. Not all wallets are SPV. Some are SPV-light.

Q: Do you think increasing on-chain bandwidth will interfere with the value of bitcoin?

A: It will increase the value of bitcoin. It will signal that we are willing to enhance the system.
A: It will increase the value of bitcoin. It will signal that we are willing to enhance the system

bip100 <http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf>

Expand Down