Skip to content

Conversation

@jesseposner
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@jonasnick jonasnick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is really cool - thank you for taking it over.

The current consensus is that this library should focus on the demands of Bitcoin Core. Modules outside of that focus can go into the libsecp-zkp fork. I initially wrote this code on top of libsecp, because libsecp-zkp was not up-to-date with the most recent libsecp. But that's not the case anymore and we have mechanisms in place now to bring libsecp-zkp in sync. Therefore, I'd recommend to rebase on top of libsecp-zkp (which should be very straightforward) and open a PR there.

@jesseposner
Copy link
Author

@jonasnick Thanks for the heads-up! I will re-open the PR in libsecp-zkp.

@bitcoin-core bitcoin-core deleted a comment from T3enale Dec 24, 2020
@jesseposner
Copy link
Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants