Skip to content

Negative powers handling#7

Draft
arossia94 wants to merge 55 commits into
mainfrom
negative-powers-handling
Draft

Negative powers handling#7
arossia94 wants to merge 55 commits into
mainfrom
negative-powers-handling

Conversation

@arossia94
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This is needed for a fully automated handling of the composite Higgs model where there are negative powers of the UV coupling.

Minimal mod to start new branch and PR
Added files and started updating the base runcard.
Default format is the older one.
Added template of function for Mass scan.
Added the required function for MassScan cards from matching results.
It prints in either Universal or SMEFiT formats.
Tried on tree and 1-loop level results.
Sample cards with the new SMEFiT format and for mass scans.
In the SMEFiT-formatted cards, the RGE settings are now printed too. In the case of  UV coupling scans, the initial RGE scale is equal to the minimum of the UV masses in GeV, i.e. the matching scale.
Additionally, included prototype new functions in the PackageTester notebook.
Matching done without the L3 term in the potential.
Obtained with SOLD.
Lacks proper treatment of constant WCs and checks against previous method.
@arossia94
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

arossia94 commented Feb 21, 2025

List of objects and tasks:

  • Implement the new logic for printing in the SMEFiT format.
  • Check the previous with cases of 1 and more couplings.
  • Extend the new logic to the printing in the general format.
  • Check it with cases of 1 and more couplings.
  • Either improve the computation of invariants or make it optional.

To be ported from the 2.0 update:

  • Add printing of electron-top 2L2Q operators.
  • Add 2L2Q operators to invariant computation.
  • Add the remaining 2L2Q operators.

@arossia94
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

The ALH scenario runcards have not been updated yet after the correction of the SILH to Warsaw change of basis since they are not of interest for the current projects.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant