Update assertion in CSPM test to check for 'guid' in response

[kooomix]

PR Type

Tests, Bug fix

---

Description

• Updated CSPM test assertion to check for guid in response.

• Improved validation logic for cloud account creation.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	cspm.py Update assertion logic in CSPM test                                            tests_scripts/accounts/cspm.py Modified assertion to check for guid in the response. Replaced previous check for "Cloud account created" in response. +1/-1

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Validation Coverage The new assertion only checks for the presence of 'guid' key but not its value or format. Consider adding validation that the guid is non-empty and follows expected format. assert "guid" in res, f"guid not in {res}"

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add type validation for response Add a type check for the response to ensure it's a dictionary before checking for 'guid' key, preventing potential AttributeError if response is a string or other type. tests_scripts/accounts/cspm.py [205] -assert "guid" in res, f"guid not in {res}" +assert isinstance(res, dict) and "guid" in res, f"Expected dictionary with 'guid' key, got: {res}" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion adds important type validation to prevent potential runtime errors, as the 'in' operator could fail if 'res' is not a dictionary. This is a significant improvement for test robustness and error clarity.	8

[github-actions]

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR