Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix the validate workflow func #594

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

fix the validate workflow func #594

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

jnathangreeg
Copy link
Contributor

@jnathangreeg jnathangreeg commented Jan 23, 2025

PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Fixed the validate_workflow function to improve error handling.

  • Replaced unnecessary variable and loop break with direct return.

  • Added a raised AssertionError for missing workflows.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
teams_workflows.py
Improved logic and error handling in `validate_workflow` 

tests_scripts/workflows/teams_workflows.py

  • Removed redundant found variable and loop break.
  • Added direct return of workflow guid when found.
  • Raised AssertionError for missing workflows.
  • +2/-5     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any question about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Error Handling

    The function assumes workflow["notifications"][0]["teamsChannels"][0] exists. Should add validation to handle cases where notifications or teamsChannels arrays are empty.

    teams_channel = workflow["notifications"][0]["teamsChannels"][0]["name"]

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add defensive dictionary access

    Add error handling for potential KeyError when accessing nested dictionary keys in
    workflow notifications. The current code assumes the structure exists.

    tests_scripts/workflows/teams_workflows.py [370]

    -teams_channel = workflow["notifications"][0]["teamsChannels"][0]["name"]
    +teams_channel = workflow.get("notifications", [{}])[0].get("teamsChannels", [{}])[0].get("name")
    +if not teams_channel:
    +    raise AssertionError(f"Invalid workflow notification structure for {expected_name}")
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion addresses a potential runtime error by adding defensive dictionary access for nested keys. This is important as missing keys in the workflow notification structure would cause KeyError exceptions that are not properly handled.

    8

    Copy link

    Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

    @kooomix kooomix merged commit 4a9d5c2 into master Jan 23, 2025
    2 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants