Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding custom framework tests #223

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2024
Merged

Adding custom framework tests #223

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2024

Conversation

dwertent
Copy link
Contributor

@dwertent dwertent commented Jan 7, 2024

Type

Tests


Description

This PR introduces three new test cases to the system test mapping. These tests are designed to scan a custom framework under different scopes:

  • File scope testing
  • Cluster scope testing
  • Both cluster and file scope testing

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files                                                                                                                                 
Tests
system_test_mapping.json                                                                       
    system_test_mapping.json

    **Added three new test cases to the system test mapping:


    • scan_custom_framework_scanning_file_scope_testing

    • scan_custom_framework_scanning_cluster_scope_testing

    • scan_custom_framework_scanning_cluster_and_file_scope_testing**
+24/-0

Signed-off-by: David Wertenteil <[email protected]>
@dwertent dwertent merged commit 815421b into master Jan 7, 2024
3 checks passed
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (89c9421)

@dwertent dwertent deleted the ustom_framework branch January 7, 2024 12:16
Copy link

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Jan 7, 2024

PR Analysis

(review updated until commit 89c9421)

  • 🎯 Main theme: Adding new test cases for a custom framework
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces three new test cases to the system test mapping. These tests are designed to scan a custom framework under different scopes: File scope testing, Cluster scope testing, and Both cluster and file scope testing.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Tests
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1, because the PR is straightforward and only involves adding new test cases to the system test mapping.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are clear. However, it would be beneficial to add a brief description for each test case in the "description" field for better understanding of what each test is designed to do.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant filesystem_test_mapping.json
suggestion      

Consider adding a brief description for each test case in the "description" field. This will provide more context about what each test is designed to do and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of each test. [medium]

relevant line"description": "",

✨ Usage tips:

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2024

Persistent review updated to latest commit 89c9421

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant