(feat) Force prefix on protected types #6007
Draft
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Enables users to force prefixes on protected types to make migration to GraphQL Mesh seamless
🚨 IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.
Any change needs to be discussed before proceeding. Failure to do so may result in the rejection of
the pull request.
Description
This change adds an optional
force
parameter to the prefix transformation.The force parameter should contain a list of strings.
This change makes it easier to migrate from custom GraphQL gateways that have prefixed custom types.
This enables us to migrate our gateway slowly without breaking the schema for the clients.
Fixes #6002
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Screenshots/Sandbox (if appropriate/relevant):
N/A
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can
reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration
Test Environment:
@graphql-mesh/...
:Checklist:
CONTRIBUTING doc and the
style guidelines of this project
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose
the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...