GH-49434: [C++][CI] Add golden integration files to IPC file fuzz corpus#49440
Merged
Conversation
pitrou
requested review from
assignUser,
jonkeane,
kou and
raulcd
as code owners
Member
Author
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g cpp |
|
Revision: b7752de Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-d059852edf
|
pitrou
force-pushed
the
gh49434-golden-ipc-file
branch
from
b7752de to
bbfbf5c
Compare
pitrou
force-pushed
the
gh49434-golden-ipc-file
branch
from
bbfbf5c to
ce494fc
Compare
wgtmac
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2026
github-actions
Bot
added
awaiting committer review
Member
Author
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-macos-monterey-cp313-cp313-arm64 |
|
Revision: ce494fc Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-e6089ea28d
|
Member
Author
|
This PR fixes the macOS wheel build issues @raulcd |
Member
Thanks @pitrou ! |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 65993cd. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 2 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
thisisnic
pushed a commit
to thisisnic/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2026
…zz corpus (apache#49440) ### Rationale for this change For the IPC stream fuzzer, we are adding the golden integration files to the seed corpus, but we are currently not doing the same thing for the file fuzzer. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Add golden IPC integration files to the IPC file fuzzer seed corpus 2. Minor cosmetic changes to the C++ test script, to make the output slightly less bulky (no functional difference) ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by existing CI tests. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: apache#49434 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Mottl
pushed a commit
to Mottl/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2026
…zz corpus (apache#49440) ### Rationale for this change For the IPC stream fuzzer, we are adding the golden integration files to the seed corpus, but we are currently not doing the same thing for the file fuzzer. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Add golden IPC integration files to the IPC file fuzzer seed corpus 2. Minor cosmetic changes to the C++ test script, to make the output slightly less bulky (no functional difference) ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by existing CI tests. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: apache#49434 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
For the IPC stream fuzzer, we are adding the golden integration files to the seed corpus, but we are currently not doing the same thing for the file fuzzer.
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Yes, by existing CI tests.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.