Skip to content

Conversation

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Nov 19, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

Prepare for 57.1.0 release

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Update Changelog. See rendered version here: https://github.com/alamb/arrow-rs/blob/alamb/prepare_57.1.0/CHANGELOG.md
  2. Update version to 57.1.0

Are these changes tested?

By CI

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes

@alamb alamb force-pushed the alamb/prepare_57.1.0 branch from beffef4 to 14b8ca1 Compare November 19, 2025 16:33
@alamb alamb marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2025 15:41
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Nov 21, 2025

Everything looks good. Let's make a RC

@alamb alamb merged commit 779e9bd into apache:main Nov 21, 2025
10 checks passed
- ValueStatistics methods can't be used from generic context in external crate [\#8823](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/8823) [[parquet](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/labels/parquet)]
- Custom Pretty-Printing Implementation for Column when Formatting Record Batches [\#8821](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/8821) [[arrow](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/labels/arrow)]
- Parquet-concat: supports bloom filter and page index [\#8804](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/8804) [[parquet](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/labels/parquet)]
- \[Parquet\] virtual row group number support [\#8800](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/8800)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This issue is not implemented but closed as a duplicate. I guess you meant to attach row number issue instead of rowgroup number?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was #7299

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you

I have a proposed fix here:

The released changelog may still have this oversight

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants