ARM: dts: adi: SC594-EZLITE/EZKIT remove tx/rx queue configs

[artursartamonovsadi]

PR Description

This PR remove device-tree configs that causes issues with NFSBOOT for SC594 EZLITE and EZKIT:
SC594 EZKIT : missed to remove emac0txconfig: tx-config in #2966
SC594 EZLITE : removed snps,mtl-rx-config and snps,mtl-tx-config from emac0 config
tested network performance with iperf3 no issues observed

PR Type

• Bug fix (a change that fixes an issue)
• New feature (a change that adds new functionality)
• Breaking change (a change that affects other repos or cause CIs to fail)

PR Checklist

• I have conducted a self-review of my own code changes
• I have compiled my changes, including the documentation
• I have tested the changes on the relevant hardware
• I have updated the documentation outside this repo accordingly
• I have provided links for the relevant upstream lore

[nunojsa]

LGTM, I would only complain that:

"This PR remove device-tree configs that causes issues with NFSBOOT for SC594 EZLITE and EZKIT:
SC594 EZKIT : missed to remove emac0txconfig: tx-config in #2966
SC594 EZLITE : removed snps,mtl-rx-config and snps,mtl-tx-config from emac0 config
tested network performance with iperf3 no issues observed"

Should be in the commit message but I guess the patch will be anyways (eventually) squashed...

[pamolloy]

LGTM, I would only complain that:

"This PR remove device-tree configs that causes issues with NFSBOOT for SC594 EZLITE and EZKIT: SC594 EZKIT : missed to remove emac0txconfig: tx-config in #2966 SC594 EZLITE : removed snps,mtl-rx-config and snps,mtl-tx-config from emac0 config tested network performance with iperf3 no issues observed"

Should be in the commit message but I guess the patch will be anyways (eventually) squashed...

Also for the future, unless we start using --fixup commits it is also helpful to add a Fixes: tag so we know which commit to squash with.

[nunojsa]

Also for the future, unless we start using --fixup commits it is also helpful to add a Fixes: tag so we know which commit to squash with.

Definitely. FWIW, if the point will be to squash, +1 for using --fixup.