landing page #63
landing page #63
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant Nav as Navigation
participant MP as MapPage
participant LM as LeafletMap
U->>Nav: Click "Map" link
Nav->>MP: Route to MapPage
MP->>LM: Dynamically import LeafletMap (no SSR)
LM-->>MP: Return loaded map component
MP-->>U: Render full-screen map with navigation
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsErrors were encountered while retrieving linked issues. Errors (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/app/map/page.tsx (1)
7-10: Ensure fallback error boundaries for dynamic imports.
This dynamic import approach is solid, especially with SSR disabled. However, consider integrating an error boundary or other graceful error-handling strategy to handle potential runtime failures more transparently.frontend/src/app/page.tsx (2)
14-55: Reevaluate double-click navigation.
Using a double-click event (line 43) to navigate to the map can be unintuitive. A single-click or a direct link might provide better user experience and reduce accidental confusion.Apply this small adjustment if you prefer single-click navigation:
- onDoubleClick={() => window.location.href = "/map"} + onClick={() => window.location.href = "/map"}
57-99: Key features section is visually clear.
EachFeatureCardis well-structured, conveys its content succinctly, and the grid layout is well-spaced. Consider using semantic elements like<article>or<section>if you want to further improve accessibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/public/images/homeMAP.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
frontend/src/app/map/page.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/page.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/navigation/navigation.tsx(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
frontend/src/app/map/page.tsx (1)
12-24: Layout and component structure look good.
Your usage of a flex container with a navigation header followed by the Leaflet map is well-organized. This ensures the map fills the remaining screen height. Excellent work.frontend/src/components/navigation/navigation.tsx (3)
11-11: New "Map" link is consistent.
The added “Map” link aligns well with existing links. No concerns regarding functionality or consistency.
19-20: Mobile menu state management is straightforward.
Using auseStatehook to toggle the menu is a clean approach. The button’s click handler correctly toggles the menu’s open state.Also applies to: 30-30
43-43: Active link highlighting is properly implemented.
Applying the conditionaltext-gray-900class and the bottom border effect strongly indicates the active route. Good job.Also applies to: 62-62
frontend/src/app/page.tsx (4)
103-132: Effective “How It Works” section.
This three-step flow is straightforward and visually balanced. Great use of separate components (StepCard) for maintainability and clarity.
135-156: Call-to-action section is well-designed.
Your CTA stands out with a clear message and distinct button styles. It effectively guides users toward the most interactive parts of your platform.
158-164: Footer content is appropriate and consistently styled.
Dynamically rendering the current year is a nice detail. Overall, there are no major concerns with the footer implementation.
169-191: Encapsulated components (FeatureCard & StepCard) look excellent.
These reusable components neatly handle their own display logic, improving maintainability and clarity. Great job!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/app/page.tsx (4)
10-55: Hero section looks great, but consider using Next.js routing instead of direct URL manipulationThe hero section has a clean, responsive design with well-structured CTAs. However, there's an issue with the image double-click handler:
- onDoubleClick={() => window.location.href = "/map"} + onDoubleClick={() => router.push("/map")}Using
window.location.hrefbypasses Next.js routing benefits like client-side navigation. Consider importing and using theuseRouterhook fromnext/navigationfor better performance and compatibility with Next.js features.
45-50: Image URL includes unnecessary query parametersThe Image component is properly using the
fillprop for responsive behavior, but the image URL contains query parameters that appear to control dimensions:- src="/images/homeMAP.png?height=2300&width=800" + src="/images/homeMAP.png"Next.js Image component already handles responsive sizing and optimization, so these parameters are likely redundant. Additionally, consider using a more descriptive alt text to improve accessibility.
57-101: Key Features section has consistent design, but duplicate icon usageThe features section is well-structured with a responsive grid layout. However, note that the MapPin icon is used for both "Optimal Site Location" (line 70) and "Interactive Mapping" (line 95). Consider using different, more specific icons for each feature to visually differentiate them.
158-164: Footer is minimal - consider enhancing with additional contentThe current footer is quite basic with just a copyright notice. Consider enhancing it with navigation links, social media links, contact information, or other relevant content that would provide value to users.
Also, there's an extra whitespace on line 162 that could be removed for cleaner code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/app/page.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
frontend/src/app/page.tsx (6)
1-7: Well-structured imports with clear organizationThe imports are organized logically, with React types, Next.js components, and Lucide icons grouped appropriately. This makes the dependencies clear and maintainable.
103-132: How It Works section has clear step progressionThe step cards effectively communicate the platform's workflow in a visual, numbered format. The responsive design ensures proper display across device sizes.
134-156: CTA section effectively reinforces key actionsThe CTA section maintains consistent styling with the hero section and provides clear pathways for users to engage with the platform's main features.
169-178: Well-designed FeatureCard component with proper TypeScript typingThe FeatureCard component effectively encapsulates the UI logic for displaying features with explicit TypeScript prop typing, making it reusable and maintainable.
180-191: Well-designed StepCard component with proper TypeScript typingThe StepCard component is cleanly implemented with good prop typing, creating a consistent visual language for the step progression in the How It Works section.
193-195: Clean default exportThe default export is clean and straightforward, following best practices for React component exports.
steps
Run
npm run dev
Localhost
http://localhost:3000
Summary by CodeRabbit