-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Ocelots - Xuan Hien Pham #12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good 🎉 I've left some feedback as comments, please check them out when you can and reach out here or on Slack if there's anything I can clarify =]
| @@ -1,16 +1,56 @@ | |||
| import React from 'react'; | |||
| import { useState } from 'react'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could combine the react imports into a single line:
import React, { useState } from 'react';| }); | ||
| setChatMessagesData(messages); | ||
| }; | ||
| let count = 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like this variable count is only used inside the function countLike, so we should move the instantiation inside of the function so the variable cannot be affected by other code.
| const countLike = () => { | ||
| for (let i = 0; i < chatMessagesData.length; ++i) { | ||
| if (chatMessagesData[i]['liked'] === true) { | ||
| count += 1; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return count; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice loop to calculate the like count from the message data! Another option is to use a higher order function like array.reduce to take our list of messages and reduce it down to a single value.
// This could be returned from a helper function
// totalLikes is a variable that accumulates a value as we loop over each entry in chatEntries
const likesCount = chatMessagesData.reduce((totalLikes, currentMessage) => {
// If currentMessage.liked is true add 1 to totalLikes, else add 0
return (totalLikes += currentMessage.liked ? 1 : 0);
}, 0); // The 0 here sets the initial value of totalLikes to 0There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! It is an interesting solution. A higher order function is take another function as its parameter. What is it in this case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case we have an anonymous function in the inner code that take in the totalLikes and currentMessage:
(totalLikes, currentMessage) => {
// If currentMessage.liked is true add 1 to totalLikes, else add 0
return (totalLikes += currentMessage.liked ? 1 : 0);
}| const onHeartButtonClick = () => { | ||
| const updatedChatMessage = { | ||
| id: props.id, | ||
| sender: props.sender, | ||
| body: props.body, | ||
| timeStamp: props.timeStamp, | ||
| liked: !props.liked, | ||
| }; | ||
| props.onUpdate(updatedChatMessage); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would consider passing the id of the message clicked to props.onUpdate and having the App code handle the new object creation. When ChatEntry creates the new object for the App state, it takes some responsibility for managing those contents. If we want the responsibility of managing the state to live solely with App, we would want it to handle defining the new message object.
This made me think of a related concept in secure design for APIs. Imagine we had an API for creating and updating messages, and it has an endpoint /<msg_id>/like meant to update a true/false liked value. We could have that endpoint accept a body in the request and let the user send an object with data for the message's record (similar to passing a message object from ChatEntry to App), but the user could choose to send any data for those values. If the endpoint only takes in an id and handles updating the liked status for the message itself, there is less opportunity for user error or malicious action.
| className={ | ||
| 'chat-entry ' + (props.sender === 'Vladimir' ? 'local' : 'remote') | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having the decision logic in the JSX may make it harder to read quickly. Another option could be to have an interpolated string here that always holds chat-entry and use a placeholder where we pass only the remote or local class name:
const entryClassName = (props.sender === 'Vladimir') ? 'local' : 'remote';
...
<div className={`chat-entry ${entryClassName}`}>|
|
||
| ChatLog.propTypes = { | ||
| entries: PropTypes.arrayOf( | ||
| PropTypes.shape({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really nice use of PropTypes.
No description provided.