-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
add support to linear maps #30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wouldn't this be better as:
Unless there is a recent development I am missing, I believe
mwill be of typeAnywithout this change.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, thanks for pointing this out, add a type parameter can increase type stability a lot.
Since this
LinearOpis only used for testing and this branch has been merged, I probability won't fix it right now. Users are suggested to use the LinearMaps.jl package.LinearMaptype in this package is much more powerful and supports many abstract operations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Let me explain a bit more why I asked. Since there is no documentation in this pull request, I looked at the code because I was a bit confused how to use this functionality. Although the pull request mentions LinearMaps, I actually mistakenly started to think that support for LinearMaps had been removed during the review process of this pull request in favor of
LinearOp.That said, why not add
LinearMapstotest/REQUIREand use it in the tests if the goal is to support it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the title of the PR was a bit misleading. Basically, a new keyword
anormwas added which also lifts the need forAto support norm/opnorm and hence allows usingLinearMaps. As @GiggleLiu says the test is not really an example for usingLinearMaps.Maybe it would be a good a idea to add such an example to README or somewhere else, though?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a good idea to add some examples. Also, it is the time to maintain a document using Documenter, rather than adding more examples into README.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@GiggleLiu Sure, it is on the list. OTOH there isn't that much to document ...